DMARvsQQQIETF Comparison
VS
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. DMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. DMAR is up 10.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$44M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$7.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DMAR and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DMAR vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DMAR QQQI | +1.00%+0.65% | +2.12%+1.01% | +10.30%+10.72% | +12.63%+14.06% | +41.00%n/a | +45.80%n/a |
| Flows | DMAR QQQI | -$3M+$447M | +$4M+$2.14B | +$44M+$7.55B | +$62M+$9.46B | +$150M- | +$277M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DMAR QQQI | +2.75%+16.13% | +3.70%+16.85% | +6.99%n/a | +7.32%n/a |
| Max drawdown | DMAR QQQI | -0.68%-6.64% | -1.72%-9.62% | -9.23%n/a | -9.73%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | DMAR QQQI | 15d13d | 7d76d | 124dn/a | 475dn/a |
Trading data
DMAR | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.77 | $53.62 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $45.86 | $54.90 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DMAR | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.77 | $53.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | -2.33% |
| AuM | $466.17 M | $14.89 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
DMAR | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 22, 2020 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
DMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
DMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
DMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about DMAR and QQQI
How have the DMAR and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, DMAR is up 10.3% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has returned 10.72%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DMAR or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the DMAR ETF saw +$44M in flows, compared to +$7.55B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: DMAR or QQQI?
Over the past year, DMAR had a volatility of 3.7%, while QQQI experienced 16.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: DMAR or QQQI?
As of October 15, 2026, DMAR holds $466.17 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $14.89 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about DMAR & QQQI
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
QQQI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
QQQI
Advertisement
Advertisement
