Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DBEFvsNTSIETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) is part of the Alternatives segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. DBEF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.26% for NTSI. DBEF is up 3.61% year-to-date (YTD) with -$63M in YTD flows. NTSI performs worse with 3.08% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBEF and NTSI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DBEF vs NTSI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBEF NTSI | -2.75%-4.55% | +5.53%+5.39% | +3.61%+3.08% | +21.29%+22.52% | +62.20%+48.89% | +86.74%n/a |
| Flows | DBEF NTSI | -$52M- | -$298M+$16M | -$63M+$16M | -$377M+$36M | +$2.19B+$140M | +$2.45B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBEF NTSI | +11.63%+13.80% | +13.78%+15.57% | +11.49%+13.66% | +11.76%n/a |
| Max drawdown | DBEF NTSI | -6.85%-8.19% | -14.30%-12.78% | -14.53%-13.88% | -14.56%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | DBEF NTSI | 9d9d | 56d41d | 73d227d | 385dn/a |
DBEF | NTSI | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.91 | $45.10 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $49.89 | $45.34 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DBEF | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DBEF | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.91 | $45.10 |
| 1D performance | +0.04% | -0.53% |
| AuM | $8.41 B | $476.63 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.26% |
DBEF | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 657 | 428 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 8, 2011 | May 20, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DBEF and NTSI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DBEF is up 3.61% year-to-date (YTD), while NTSI has returned 3.08%. That puts DBEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBEF or NTSI?
Year-to-date, the DBEF ETF saw -$63M in flows, compared to +$16M for NTSI.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBEF or NTSI?
Over the past year, DBEF had a volatility of 13.78%, while NTSI experienced 15.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBEF or NTSI?
As of March 10, 2026, DBEF holds $8.41 B in assets under management (AUM), while NTSI manages $476.63 M.
What sectors do the DBEF and NTSI ETFs invest in?
DBEF leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, NTSI focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DBEF ETF and NTSI ETF?
DBEF top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS. NTSI holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, HSBC HOLDINGS and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBEF or NTSI?
DBEF holds 697 securities with 17.46% of its assets in the top 15. NTSI has 451 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.82%.
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
