CTAvsDBMFETF Comparison
VS
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. CTA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.85% for DBMF. CTA is up 15.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$64M in YTD flows. DBMF performs better with 18.37% YTD performance, and +$3.08B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CTA and DBMF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CTA vs DBMF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CTA DBMF | -1.53%+2.36% | +14.71%+6.60% | +15.17%+18.37% | +8.88%+22.09% | +36.28%+33.16% | n/a+61.36% |
| Flows | CTA DBMF | -$190M+$647M | -$372M+$1.51B | +$64M+$3.08B | +$95M+$3.35B | +$1.13B+$4.20B | -+$5.27B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CTA DBMF | +28.27%+9.31% | +24.16%+11.91% | +18.05%+10.77% | n/a+12.04% |
| Max drawdown | CTA DBMF | -10.90%-2.77% | -20.73%-6.02% | -20.73%-15.75% | n/a-19.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | CTA DBMF | 39d22d | 151d75d | 151d489d | n/a1155d |
Trading data
CTA | DBMF | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.15 | $32.71 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $29.44 | $32.83 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CTA | DBMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.15 | $32.71 |
| 1D performance | +2.41% | -0.37% |
| AuM | $1.38 B | $5.66 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
CTA | DBMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Simplify | iM Global Partner |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 7, 2022 | May 7, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CTA
Data will be available soon
DBMF
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CTA
Data will be available soon
DBMF
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CTA
Data will be available soon
DBMF
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CTA
Data will be available soon
DBMF
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CTA and DBMF
How have the CTA and DBMF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, CTA is up 15.17% year-to-date (YTD), while DBMF has returned 18.37%. That puts DBMF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CTA or DBMF?
Year-to-date, the CTA ETF saw +$64M in flows, compared to +$3.08B for DBMF.
Which ETF is more volatile: CTA or DBMF?
Over the past year, CTA had a volatility of 24.16%, while DBMF experienced 11.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: CTA or DBMF?
As of October 16, 2026, CTA holds $1.38 B in assets under management (AUM), while DBMF manages $5.66 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about CTA & DBMF
How Some ETF Issuers Use Their Own Funds for Cash Management
October 9, 2026
CTA
There’s an ETF for That? Investing Like University Endowments
September 15, 2026
DBMF
ETF Strategies Explained for Dummies (With Examples)
July 29, 2025
DBMF
Advertisement
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
DBMF
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
DBMF
DBMF: A top ETF outperformer in 2022
November 10, 2022
DBMF
A short primer to Hedge Fund ETFs
July 8, 2022
DBMF
Advertisement
