CSNRvsPHOETF Comparison
VS
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CSNR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Materials and Consumer Staples. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. CSNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.59% for PHO. CSNR is up 20.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$36M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with -1.32% YTD performance, and +$45M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSNR and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSNR vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSNR PHO | +3.19%+5.84% | +7.05%-5.13% | +20.65%-1.32% | +55.69%+8.40% | n/a+34.70% | n/a+35.51% |
| Flows | CSNR PHO | +$10M+$45M | +$31M+$53M | +$36M+$45M | +$45M-$82M | --$175M | --$9M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSNR PHO | +21.29%+16.42% | +15.57%+15.37% | n/a+16.15% | n/a+18.22% |
| Max drawdown | CSNR PHO | -7.77%-11.58% | -7.77%-11.99% | n/a-19.26% | n/a-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSNR PHO | 38d78d | 38d188d | n/a250d | n/a715d |
Trading data
CSNR | PHO | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.85 | $68.53 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $37.01 | $69.34 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCSNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CSNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.85 | $68.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.43% | -1.17% |
| AuM | $97.15 M | $2.11 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
CSNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | NASDAQ OMX US Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 52 | 34 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2025 | December 6, 2005 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSNR
USA
40.51%
Canada
18.72%
United Kingdom
7.63%
Other
33.14%
PHO
USA
94.98%
Other
5.02%
Sectors
CSNR
Energy
34.66%
Materials
31.97%
Consumer Staples
7.82%
Other
25.55%
PHO
Industrials
42.81%
Utilities
14.14%
Information Techn.
13.87%
Materials
8.45%
Health Care
8.03%
Other
12.7%
Advertisement
Diversification
CSNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.77%
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
76.72%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
CSNR
EXXON
6.36%
TOTALENERGIES SE
6.27%
SHELL PLC
5.65%
CH1300646267
4.10%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.86%
CONOCOPHILLIPS
3.43%
US7594701077
2.87%
NEWMONT CORP
2.66%
MOWI ASA
2.66%
CORTEVA INC
2.65%
NUTRIEN LTD
2.61%
GLENCORE PLC
2.51%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.42%
THE MOSAIC COMPANY
2.39%
BARRICK GOLD
2.33%
PHO
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC
8.73%
WATERS
8.03%
AMERICAN WATER WORKS
7.77%
US31488V1070
7.64%
ECOLAB
7.52%
XYLEM
4.02%
IDEX
3.95%
CORE & MAIN
3.94%
US92338C1036
3.87%
AECOM
3.87%
PENTAIR PLC
3.80%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC
3.71%
MUELLER INDUSTRIES
3.67%
A O SMITH
3.11%
TETRA TECH
3.10%
Frequently asked questions about CSNR and PHO
How have the CSNR and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, CSNR is up 20.65% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has lost -1.32%. That puts CSNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSNR or PHO?
Year-to-date, the CSNR ETF saw +$36M in flows, compared to +$45M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSNR or PHO?
Over the past year, CSNR had a volatility of 15.57%, while PHO experienced 15.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSNR or PHO?
As of April 24, 2026, CSNR holds $97.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $2.11 B.
What sectors do the CSNR and PHO ETFs invest in?
CSNR leans toward sectors like Energy, Materials and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CSNR ETF and PHO ETF?
CSNR top holdings include EXXON, TOTALENERGIES SE and SHELL PLC. PHO holds in its top three: ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC, WATERS and AMERICAN WATER WORKS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSNR or PHO?
CSNR holds 59 securities with 52.77% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 76.72%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CSNR & PHO
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
February 10, 2025
CSNR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
