CSNRvsPHOETF Comparison
VS
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CSNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. CSNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.59% for PHO. CSNR is up 13.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$40M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with -4.17% YTD performance, and -$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSNR and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSNR vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSNR PHO | -5.41%+3.82% | -2.42%+1.25% | +13.27%-4.17% | +32.58%-0.75% | n/a+23.72% | n/a+33.57% |
| Flows | CSNR PHO | -$2M-$91M | +$15M-$31M | +$40M-$27M | +$49M-$133M | --$239M | --$198M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSNR PHO | +16.17%+16.12% | +16.49%+15.15% | n/a+16.24% | n/a+18.25% |
| Max drawdown | CSNR PHO | -8.25%-9.02% | -8.25%-13.83% | n/a-19.26% | n/a-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSNR PHO | 67d65d | 67d240d | n/a250d | n/a715d |
Trading data
CSNR | PHO | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.82 | $67.36 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $35.39 | $66.77 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCSNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CSNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.82 | $67.36 |
| 1D performance | -1.61% | +0.88% |
| AuM | $94.69 M | $1.97 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
CSNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | NASDAQ OMX US Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 34 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2025 | December 6, 2005 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSNR
USA
38.1%
Canada
20.15%
Other
41.75%
PHO
USA
94.87%
Other
5.13%
Sectors
CSNR
Materials
34.3%
Energy
33.06%
Other
32.64%
PHO
Industrials
44.19%
Utilities
13.11%
Information Techn.
13.01%
Materials
8.27%
Health Care
7.86%
Other
13.57%
Advertisement
Diversification
CSNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.46%
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
76.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
CSNR
EXXON
5.94%
TOTALENERGIES SE
5.24%
SHELL PLC
4.69%
CH1300646267
3.88%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.81%
CONOCOPHILLIPS
3.09%
NUTRIEN LTD
2.90%
US7594701077
2.85%
NEWMONT CORP
2.85%
GLENCORE PLC
2.82%
BARRICK GOLD
2.56%
ENI
2.55%
CORTEVA INC
2.49%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.46%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
2.33%
PHO
US31488V1070
8.49%
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC
8.44%
WATERS
7.86%
ECOLAB
7.28%
AMERICAN WATER WORKS
7.08%
MUELLER INDUSTRIES
4.36%
IDEX
4.15%
XYLEM
3.99%
PENTAIR PLC
3.90%
CORE & MAIN
3.89%
US92338C1036
3.75%
AECOM
3.51%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC
3.42%
ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
3.29%
TETRA TECH
3.11%
Frequently asked questions about CSNR and PHO
How have the CSNR and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 19, 2026, CSNR is up 13.27% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has lost -4.17%. That puts CSNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSNR or PHO?
Year-to-date, the CSNR ETF saw +$40M in flows, compared to -$27M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSNR or PHO?
Over the past year, CSNR had a volatility of 16.49%, while PHO experienced 15.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSNR or PHO?
As of June 19, 2026, CSNR holds $94.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $1.97 B.
What sectors do the CSNR and PHO ETFs invest in?
CSNR leans toward sectors like Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CSNR ETF and PHO ETF?
CSNR top holdings include EXXON, TOTALENERGIES SE and SHELL PLC. PHO holds in its top three: US31488V1070, ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC and WATERS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSNR or PHO?
CSNR holds 51 securities with 50.46% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 76.51%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CSNR & PHO
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
February 10, 2025
CSNR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
