CSNRvsPHOETF Comparison
VS
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CSNR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. CSNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.59% for PHO. CSNR is up 25.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$47M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with -2.45% YTD performance, and -$109M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSNR and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSNR vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSNR PHO | +2.92%-3.94% | +8.54%+2.65% | +25.40%-2.45% | +36.11%-3.20% | n/a+27.30% | n/a+23.60% |
| Flows | CSNR PHO | +$7M-$28M | +$7M-$89M | +$47M-$109M | +$54M-$209M | --$332M | --$492M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSNR PHO | +14.80%+17.11% | +16.94%+15.77% | n/a+16.64% | n/a+18.44% |
| Max drawdown | CSNR PHO | -5.97%-7.22% | -12.00%-13.83% | n/a-19.26% | n/a-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSNR PHO | 34d39d | 127d331d | n/a250d | n/a715d |
Trading data
CSNR | PHO | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.81 | $68.19 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $38.28 | $68.45 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCSNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CSNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.81 | $68.19 |
| 1D performance | -1.22% | -0.39% |
| AuM | $110.80 M | $1.92 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
CSNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | NASDAQ OMX US Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 40 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2025 | December 6, 2005 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSNR
USA
43.02%
Canada
19.96%
United Kingdom
8.85%
Other
28.18%
PHO
USA
95.25%
Other
4.75%
Sectors
CSNR
Energy
42.92%
Non-Energy Materi.
36.21%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.57%
Other
5.29%
PHO
Industrials
45.27%
Healthcare
17.07%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.54%
Technology
14.66%
Utilities
7.47%
Other
0%
Diversification
CSNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.2%
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.01%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CSNR
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
6.33%
Shell Plc
4.78%
Bunge Global SA
4.12%
Nutrien Ltd.
3.84%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
3.57%
Glencore Plc
3.07%
Corteva, Inc.
2.98%
TotalEnergies SE
2.95%
Franco-Nevada Corp.
2.94%
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
2.72%
Mowi ASA
2.71%
Eni SpA
2.58%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
2.57%
Newmont Corp.
2.56%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.49%
PHO
Roper Technologies, Inc.
9.37%
Ecolab, Inc.
8.29%
Waters Corp.
6.69%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
6.57%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
6.51%
Veralto Corp.
4.49%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.19%
Xylem, Inc.
4.17%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
3.87%
IDEX Corp.
3.61%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.33%
Pentair plc
3.17%
AECOM
3.01%
Trimble, Inc.
2.94%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
2.80%
Frequently asked questions about CSNR and PHO
How have the CSNR and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, CSNR is up 25.4% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has lost -2.45%. That puts CSNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSNR or PHO?
Year-to-date, the CSNR ETF saw +$47M in flows, compared to -$109M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSNR or PHO?
Over the past year, CSNR had a volatility of 16.94%, while PHO experienced 15.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSNR or PHO?
As of September 17, 2026, CSNR holds $110.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $1.92 B.
What sectors do the CSNR and PHO ETFs invest in?
CSNR leans toward sectors like Energy, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CSNR ETF and PHO ETF?
CSNR top holdings include ExxonMobil Holdings Corp., Shell Plc and Bunge Global SA. PHO holds in its top three: Roper Technologies, Inc., Ecolab, Inc. and Waters Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CSNR or PHO?
CSNR holds 59 securities with 50.2% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.01%.
Latest news about CSNR & PHO
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
PHO
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
February 10, 2025
CSNR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
