CSNRvsMOOETF Comparison
VS
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CSNR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. CSNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.56% for MOO. CSNR is up 23.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$47M in YTD flows. MOO performs worse with 17.5% YTD performance, and +$570M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSNR and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSNR vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSNR MOO | +1.67%+5.15% | +5.42%+9.52% | +23.88%+17.50% | +33.76%+17.77% | n/a+13.87% | n/a+3.67% |
| Flows | CSNR MOO | +$7M+$227M | +$7M+$251M | +$47M+$570M | +$54M+$542M | -+$209M | -+$391M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSNR MOO | +15.06%+13.47% | +16.92%+13.69% | n/a+14.65% | n/a+16.51% |
| Max drawdown | CSNR MOO | -7.55%-3.72% | -12.00%-10.98% | n/a-21.19% | n/a-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSNR MOO | 43d14d | 127d193d | n/a844d | n/a1610d |
Trading data
CSNR | MOO | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 4:50 PM | $38.20 | $86.28 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $37.76 | $85.29 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCSNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 4:50 PM
Live
Closed
CSNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.20 | $86.28 |
| 1D performance | +1.15% | +1.15% |
| AuM | $109.46 M | $1.26 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
CSNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | VanEck |
| Benchmark | - | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 46 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2025 | August 31, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
CSNR
USA
43.02%
Canada
19.96%
United Kingdom
8.85%
Other
28.18%
MOO
USA
51.57%
Germany
9.81%
Norway
7.29%
Other
31.34%
Sectors
CSNR
Energy
42.92%
Non-Energy Materi.
36.21%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.57%
Other
5.29%
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
34.03%
Non-Energy Materi.
29.09%
Industrials
20.65%
Healthcare
16.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
CSNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.2%
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CSNR
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
6.33%
Shell Plc
4.78%
Bunge Global SA
4.12%
Nutrien Ltd.
3.84%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
3.57%
Glencore Plc
3.07%
Corteva, Inc.
2.98%
TotalEnergies SE
2.95%
Franco-Nevada Corp.
2.94%
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
2.72%
Mowi ASA
2.71%
Eni SpA
2.58%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
2.57%
Newmont Corp.
2.56%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.49%
MOO
Corteva, Inc.
8.92%
Bayer AG
8.89%
Deere & Co.
7.95%
Nutrien Ltd.
6.57%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.21%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.07%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.81%
Kubota Corp.
4.77%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
4.37%
Bunge Global SA
3.14%
Mowi ASA
3.01%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.58%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.57%
Yara International ASA
2.39%
CNH Industrial NV
2.24%
Frequently asked questions about CSNR and MOO
How have the CSNR and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, CSNR is up 23.88% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 17.5%. That puts CSNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSNR or MOO?
Year-to-date, the CSNR ETF saw +$47M in flows, compared to +$570M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSNR or MOO?
Over the past year, CSNR had a volatility of 16.92%, while MOO experienced 13.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSNR or MOO?
As of September 16, 2026, CSNR holds $109.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $1.26 B.
What sectors do the CSNR and MOO ETFs invest in?
CSNR leans toward sectors like Energy, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CSNR ETF and MOO ETF?
CSNR top holdings include ExxonMobil Holdings Corp., Shell Plc and Bunge Global SA. MOO holds in its top three: Corteva, Inc., Bayer AG and Deere & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: CSNR or MOO?
CSNR holds 59 securities with 50.2% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.49%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CSNR & MOO
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
February 10, 2025
CSNR
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
Advertisement
Advertisement
