Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CSNRvsMOOETF Comparison
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CSNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. CSNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.55% for MOO. CSNR is up 18.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. MOO performs worse with 15.03% YTD performance, and +$299M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSNR and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CSNR vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSNR MOO | -0.52%-2.06% | +19.80%+15.35% | +18.97%+15.03% | +56.79%+25.31% | n/a+7.87% | n/a+6.97% |
| Flows | CSNR MOO | +$21M+$44M | +$27M+$295M | +$26M+$299M | +$51M+$266M | --$224M | -+$91M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSNR MOO | +20.68%+13.81% | +18.07%+15.71% | n/a+14.91% | n/a+16.35% |
| Max drawdown | CSNR MOO | -5.16%-4.90% | -14.28%-12.71% | n/a-26.51% | n/a-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSNR MOO | 9d20d | 46d43d | n/a1015d | n/a1421d |
CSNR | MOO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.24 | $83.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.84 | $84.76 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CSNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CSNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.24 | $83.54 |
| 1D performance | -1.63% | -1.44% |
| AuM | $86.08 M | $970.45 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.55% |
CSNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | VanEck |
| Benchmark | - | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 46 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2025 | August 31, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CSNR and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CSNR is up 18.97% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 15.03%. That puts CSNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSNR or MOO?
Year-to-date, the CSNR ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$299M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSNR or MOO?
Over the past year, CSNR had a volatility of 18.07%, while MOO experienced 15.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSNR or MOO?
As of March 11, 2026, CSNR holds $86.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $970.45 M.
What sectors do the CSNR and MOO ETFs invest in?
CSNR leans toward sectors like Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CSNR ETF and MOO ETF?
CSNR top holdings include EXXON, CH1300646267 and SHELL PLC. MOO holds in its top three: DEERE, BAYER AG and ZOETIS INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSNR or MOO?
CSNR holds 55 securities with 51.51% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.5%.
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
