CSNRvsMOOETF Comparison
VS
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CSNR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Materials and Consumer Staples. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. CSNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.55% for MOO. CSNR is up 20.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$36M in YTD flows. MOO performs worse with 13.27% YTD performance, and +$492M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSNR and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSNR vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSNR MOO | +3.19%-0.39% | +7.05%+1.93% | +20.65%+13.27% | +55.69%+23.44% | n/a+5.89% | n/a+1.28% |
| Flows | CSNR MOO | +$10M+$65M | +$31M+$380M | +$36M+$492M | +$45M+$460M | -+$8M | -+$217M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSNR MOO | +21.29%+14.86% | +15.57%+13.06% | n/a+14.77% | n/a+16.41% |
| Max drawdown | CSNR MOO | -7.77%-6.70% | -7.77%-8.31% | n/a-26.31% | n/a-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSNR MOO | 38d67d | 38d134d | n/a915d | n/a1468d |
Trading data
CSNR | MOO | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.85 | $82.05 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $37.01 | $82.14 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCSNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CSNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.85 | $82.05 |
| 1D performance | -0.43% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $97.15 M | $1.15 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.55% |
Characteristics
CSNR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | VanEck |
| Benchmark | - | MVIS Global Agribusiness Index |
| N° of holdings | 52 | 46 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2025 | August 31, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSNR
USA
40.51%
Canada
18.72%
United Kingdom
7.63%
Other
33.14%
MOO
USA
49.59%
Germany
8.79%
Norway
8%
Other
33.62%
Sectors
CSNR
Energy
34.66%
Materials
31.97%
Consumer Staples
7.82%
Other
25.55%
MOO
Consumer Staples
33.16%
Materials
25.92%
Industrials
19.18%
Health Care
17.03%
Other
4.7%
Advertisement
Diversification
CSNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.77%
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
CSNR
EXXON
6.36%
TOTALENERGIES SE
6.27%
SHELL PLC
5.65%
CH1300646267
4.10%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.86%
CONOCOPHILLIPS
3.43%
US7594701077
2.87%
NEWMONT CORP
2.66%
MOWI ASA
2.66%
CORTEVA INC
2.65%
NUTRIEN LTD
2.61%
GLENCORE PLC
2.51%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.42%
THE MOSAIC COMPANY
2.39%
BARRICK GOLD
2.33%
MOO
BAYER AG
7.77%
DEERE
7.53%
CORTEVA INC
6.90%
ZOETIS INC
6.85%
NUTRIEN LTD
5.83%
ARCHER DANIELS
5.61%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS
5.53%
TYSON FOODS
4.83%
CH1300646267
3.89%
KUBOTA
3.80%
MOWI ASA
3.09%
WILMAR INTERNATIONAL
3.09%
YARA INTL
2.88%
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC
2.54%
TORO
2.19%
Frequently asked questions about CSNR and MOO
How have the CSNR and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, CSNR is up 20.65% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 13.27%. That puts CSNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSNR or MOO?
Year-to-date, the CSNR ETF saw +$36M in flows, compared to +$492M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSNR or MOO?
Over the past year, CSNR had a volatility of 15.57%, while MOO experienced 13.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSNR or MOO?
As of April 24, 2026, CSNR holds $97.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $1.15 B.
What sectors do the CSNR and MOO ETFs invest in?
CSNR leans toward sectors like Energy, Materials and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CSNR ETF and MOO ETF?
CSNR top holdings include EXXON, TOTALENERGIES SE and SHELL PLC. MOO holds in its top three: BAYER AG, DEERE and CORTEVA INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSNR or MOO?
CSNR holds 59 securities with 52.77% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.32%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CSNR & MOO
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
February 10, 2025
CSNR
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
Advertisement
Advertisement
