CQQQvsKWEBETF Comparison

ETF 1

CQQQ

Invesco China Technology ETF

This fund is part of

China Blended Cap

-0.77%

Full CQQQ fund page

ETF 2

KWEB

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

This fund is part of

EM Awakening

-0.12%

Full KWEB fund page

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) belongs to the China Blended Cap segment. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is part of the EM Awakening segment. CQQQ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, KWEB's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. CQQQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.69% for KWEB. CQQQ is down -11.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$320M in YTD flows. KWEB performs worse with -28.02% YTD performance, and -$1.01B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CQQQ and KWEB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

CQQQ vs KWEB performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 09/15/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	CQQQ KWEB	-10.80%-7.99%	-13.87%-7.71%	-11.41%-28.02%	-14.03%-36.14%	+23.73%-1.41%	-30.36%-40.47%
Flows	CQQQ KWEB	-$162M-$180M	+$2M-$679M	+$320M-$1.01B	+$1.62B-$766M	+$2.19B+$770M	+$2.19B+$3.54B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	CQQQ KWEB	+29.91%+27.29%	+29.50%+24.88%	+29.58%+29.89%	+32.74%+39.57%
Max drawdown	CQQQ KWEB	-19.19%-14.67%	-24.05%-42.02%	-27.20%-42.02%	-61.50%-62.67%
Max drawdown duration	CQQQ KWEB	77d35d	344d347d	375d347d	1759d1790d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	CQQQ	KWEB
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM	$46.17	$24.24
Previous close 09/15/2026	$46.11	$24.48
Consolidated volume 09/15/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of August 31, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	CQQQ	KWEB
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	CQQQ	KWEB
Last price	$46.17	$24.24
1D performance	+0.13%	-0.98%
AuM	$2.74 B	$4.71 B
E/R	0.65%	0.69%

Characteristics

	CQQQ	KWEB
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Invesco	KraneShares
Benchmark	FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index	CSI Overseas China Internet Index
N° of holdings	174	33
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	December 8, 2009	July 31, 2013
ESG	No	No

More CQQQ data on Trackinsight

More KWEB data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

CQQQ

China

86.93%

Ireland

11.22%

Other

1.85%

KWEB

China

82.14%

Ireland

8.01%

Other

9.85%

Sectors

CQQQ

Technology

63.97%

Consumer Services

12.58%

Consumer Non-Cycl.

11.22%

Other

12.22%

KWEB

Technology

39.58%

Consumer Non-Cycl.

27.51%

Consumer Services

14.35%

Other

18.56%

Diversification

CQQQ

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

64.9%

KWEB

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

77.81%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026

CQQQ

Meituan

12.24%

PDD Holdings, Inc.

11.22%

Tencent Holdings Ltd.

10.36%

Baidu, Inc.

8.03%

Kuaishou Technology

4.88%

Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor Ltd.

3.50%

Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.

2.10%

Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.

1.93%

Horizon Robotics

1.76%

SenseTime Group, Inc.

1.66%

Bilibili, Inc.

1.54%

NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.

1.50%

Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.

1.46%

Tencent Music Entertainment Group

1.42%

Kingboard Laminates Holdings Ltd.

1.31%

KWEB

Tencent Holdings Ltd.

9.96%

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.

8.37%

PDD Holdings, Inc.

8.01%

Meituan

7.96%

NetEase, Inc.

6.17%

JD.com, Inc.

4.28%

Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.

4.19%

KE Holdings, Inc.

3.88%

Trip.com Group Ltd.

3.75%

Kuaishou Technology

3.70%

JD Health International, Inc.

3.63%

Kanzhun Ltd.

3.54%

Bilibili, Inc.

3.53%

Baidu, Inc.

3.49%

TAL Education Group

3.35%

Frequently asked questions about CQQQ and KWEB

How have the CQQQ and KWEB ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 15, 2026, CQQQ is down -11.41% year-to-date (YTD), while KWEB has lost -28.02%. That puts CQQQ better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CQQQ or KWEB?

Year-to-date, the CQQQ ETF saw +$320M in flows, compared to -$1.01B for KWEB.

Which ETF is more volatile: CQQQ or KWEB?

Over the past year, CQQQ had a volatility of 29.5%, while KWEB experienced 24.88%.

Which ETF is bigger: CQQQ or KWEB?

As of September 15, 2026, CQQQ holds $2.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while KWEB manages $4.71 B.

What sectors do the CQQQ and KWEB ETFs invest in?

CQQQ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, KWEB focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services.

What are the top holdings of the CQQQ ETF and KWEB ETF?

CQQQ top holdings include Meituan, PDD Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd.. KWEB holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc..

CQQQvsKWEBETF Comparison

Invesco China Technology ETF

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

CQQQ vs KWEB performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the CQQQ and KWEB ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 15, 2026, CQQQ is down -11.41% year-to-date (YTD), while KWEB has lost -28.02%. That puts CQQQ better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CQQQ or KWEB?

Year-to-date, the CQQQ ETF saw +$320M in flows, compared to -$1.01B for KWEB.

Which ETF is more volatile: CQQQ or KWEB?

Over the past year, CQQQ had a volatility of 29.5%, while KWEB experienced 24.88%.

Which ETF is bigger: CQQQ or KWEB?

As of September 15, 2026, CQQQ holds $2.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while KWEB manages $4.71 B.

What sectors do the CQQQ and KWEB ETFs invest in?

CQQQ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, KWEB focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services.

What are the top holdings of the CQQQ ETF and KWEB ETF?

CQQQ top holdings include Meituan, PDD Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd.. KWEB holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: CQQQ or KWEB?

CQQQ holds 180 securities with 64.9% of its assets in the top 15. KWEB has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.81%.

U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets

Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch

Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market

There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in China's Comeback

Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs

Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs

Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets

China's Stock Market Struggles Amid Evergrande Crisis

Expert-Built ETF Portfolios, All in One Place