COPPvsEMETETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF (EMET) is part of the Natural Resources segment. COPP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Finance and Non-Corporate. In contrast, EMET's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials. COPP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.62% for EMET. COPP is up 32.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$158M in YTD flows. EMET performs worse with 17.53% YTD performance, and +$752K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COPP and EMET below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
COPP vs EMET performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COPP EMET | +5.68%-1.94% | +15.58%+6.94% | +32.17%+17.53% | +86.44%+58.29% | n/a+81.14% | n/an/a |
| Flows | COPP EMET | -$5M- | -$32M-$4M | +$158M+$752K | +$203M+$3M | --$2M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COPP EMET | +42.80%+39.72% | +42.07%+38.65% | n/a+32.14% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | COPP EMET | -17.78%-19.70% | -27.60%-24.48% | n/a-39.33% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | COPP EMET | 65d65d | 96d193d | n/a478d | n/an/a |
Trading data
COPP | EMET | |
Last sale 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.80 | |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $46.14 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
COPP | EMET | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
COPP | EMET | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.80 | – |
| 1D performance | -7.24% | – |
| AuM | $307.92 M | $37.02 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.62% |
Characteristics
COPP | EMET | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index | MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index |
| N° of holdings | 245 | 57 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 5, 2024 | November 11, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
COPP
Canada
36.68%
USA
31%
United Kingdom
9.12%
Other
23.2%
EMET
Canada
20.37%
USA
16.46%
United Kingdom
14.48%
China
13.51%
South Africa
7.83%
Mexico
7.7%
Other
19.64%
Sectors
COPP
Non-Energy Materi.
93.88%
Other
6.12%
EMET
Non-Energy Materi.
100%
Other
-0%
Advertisement
Diversification
COPP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
86.4%
EMET
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
COPP
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
25.17%
Teck Resources Limited
10.02%
Antofagasta Plc
8.95%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.99%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
4.94%
CA85210C1005
4.89%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
4.70%
Lundin Mining Corp.
4.33%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
4.08%
Capstone Copper Corp.
3.40%
Sandfire Resources Ltd.
2.55%
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
2.45%
MMG Ltd.
2.29%
PT Amman Mineral Internasional Tbk
2.29%
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
1.36%
EMET
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
8.37%
Anglo American Plc
8.36%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
7.70%
Teck Resources Limited
6.94%
Antofagasta Plc
5.15%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.07%
Lundin Mining Corp.
3.56%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
3.37%
Boliden AB
3.36%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.12%
Albemarle Corp.
2.68%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd.
2.48%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
2.47%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
2.19%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
2.03%
Frequently asked questions about COPP and EMET
How have the COPP and EMET ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 9, 2026, COPP is up 32.17% year-to-date (YTD), while EMET has returned 17.53%. That puts COPP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COPP or EMET?
Year-to-date, the COPP ETF saw +$158M in flows, compared to +$752K for EMET.
Which ETF is more volatile: COPP or EMET?
Over the past year, COPP had a volatility of 42.07%, while EMET experienced 38.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: COPP or EMET?
As of September 9, 2026, COPP holds $307.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while EMET manages $37.02 M.
What sectors do the COPP and EMET ETFs invest in?
COPP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, EMET focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the COPP ETF and EMET ETF?
COPP top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Teck Resources Limited and Antofagasta Plc. EMET holds in its top three: Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V..
Which ETF is more diversified: COPP or EMET?
COPP holds 245 securities with 86.4% of its assets in the top 15. EMET has 57 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.83%.
Advertisement
Latest news about COPP & EMET
ETF Comparison: Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Versus Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP)
February 6, 2026
COPP
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
COPP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
COPP
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Copper ETFs
May 28, 2024
COPP
Advertisement
Advertisement
