Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CHPSvsTYLGETF Comparison
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is part of the Options Strategies segment. CHPS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, TYLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology CHPS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.64% for TYLG. CHPS is up 17.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. TYLG performs worse with -0.73% YTD performance, and +$700K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CHPS and TYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CHPS vs TYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHPS TYLG | -2.86%-0.89% | +14.56%-1.35% | +17.14%-0.73% | +96.51%+27.47% | n/a+83.50% | n/an/a |
| Flows | CHPS TYLG | +$13M+$700K | +$24M+$700K | +$22M+$700K | +$28M+$34K | -+$8M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CHPS TYLG | +29.36%+18.26% | +29.87%+23.12% | n/a+19.20% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CHPS TYLG | -11.22%-7.50% | -22.03%-16.36% | n/a-23.70% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CHPS TYLG | 13d42d | 46d45d | n/a140d | n/an/a |
CHPS | TYLG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 3:50 PM | $53.95 | $35.44 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $55.79 | $35.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CHPS | TYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CHPS | TYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.95 | $35.44 |
| 1D performance | -3.31% | +0.50% |
| AuM | $42.67 M | $11.69 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.64% |
CHPS | TYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | Global X |
| Benchmark | Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index | Cboe S&P Technology Select Sector Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 65 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2023 | November 21, 2022 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CHPS and TYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, CHPS is up 17.14% year-to-date (YTD), while TYLG has lost -0.73%. That puts CHPS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CHPS or TYLG?
Year-to-date, the CHPS ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to +$700K for TYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: CHPS or TYLG?
Over the past year, CHPS had a volatility of 29.87%, while TYLG experienced 23.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: CHPS or TYLG?
As of March 10, 2026, CHPS holds $42.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while TYLG manages $11.69 M.
What sectors do the CHPS and TYLG ETFs invest in?
CHPS leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, TYLG focuses on Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CHPS ETF and TYLG ETF?
CHPS top holdings include MICRON TECHNOLOGY, SK HYNIX and US5128073062. TYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or TYLG?
CHPS holds 56 securities with 68.99% of its assets in the top 15. TYLG has 70 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.11%.
Ask the Manager: Dr. Maria Milina on Artificial Intelligence and What to expect in 2026
Global X launches new sector covered call ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
