CGWvsFIWETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and First Trust ISE Water Index Fund ETF (FIW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, FIW's top sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Healthcare. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.51% for FIW. CGW is up 2.66% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. FIW performs better with 3% YTD performance, and -$36M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and FIW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGW vs FIW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW FIW | -1.06%+2.85% | +0.49%+4.41% | +2.66%+3.00% | +6.24%+2.43% | +28.74%+25.07% | +23.19%+33.51% |
| Flows | CGW FIW | +$10M+$17M | +$15M+$1M | +$41M-$36M | +$26M-$2M | -$156M+$123M | -$115M+$414M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW FIW | +14.70%+17.76% | +13.31%+16.37% | +13.81%+16.74% | +15.73%+18.73% |
| Max drawdown | CGW FIW | -5.68%-7.16% | -10.52%-13.79% | -15.71%-18.25% | -32.65%-28.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW FIW | 50d48d | 153d187d | 135d238d | 862d710d |
Trading data
CGW | FIW | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.00 | $108.49 |
| Previous close 07/29/2026 | $64.66 | $109.70 |
| Consolidated volume 07/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGW | FIW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGW | FIW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.00 | $108.49 |
| 1D performance | +0.52% | -1.10% |
| AuM | $1.05 B | $1.91 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.51% |
Characteristics
CGW | FIW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Water Index | ISE Clean Edge Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 67 | 36 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 14, 2007 | May 8, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGW
USA
59.15%
United Kingdom
11.29%
Brazil
10.57%
Other
18.99%
FIW
USA
91.45%
Other
8.55%
Sectors
CGW
Utilities
43.48%
Industrials
36.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.18%
Other
3.78%
FIW
Industrials
48.44%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.34%
Healthcare
12.99%
Utilities
11.32%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.53%
Other
4.38%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.66%
FIW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
58.3%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
7.85%
Xylem, Inc.
7.34%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.32%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.80%
Veralto Corp.
5.33%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.18%
United Utilities Group Plc
4.16%
Severn Trent Plc
3.95%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.53%
Geberit AG
3.38%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.15%
American States Water Co.
2.63%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.41%
California Water Service Group
2.40%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.22%
FIW
Waters Corp.
4.96%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
4.60%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
4.25%
Masco Corp.
4.18%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.06%
IDEX Corp.
3.94%
Veralto Corp.
3.88%
Xylem, Inc.
3.79%
Ecolab, Inc.
3.78%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
3.68%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.64%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
3.57%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
3.43%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.31%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.23%
Frequently asked questions about CGW and FIW
How have the CGW and FIW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 29, 2026, CGW is up 2.66% year-to-date (YTD), while FIW has returned 3%. That puts FIW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or FIW?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to -$36M for FIW.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or FIW?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.31%, while FIW experienced 16.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or FIW?
As of July 29, 2026, CGW holds $1.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while FIW manages $1.91 B.
What sectors do the CGW and FIW ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, FIW focuses on Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and FIW ETF?
CGW top holdings include American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP. FIW holds in its top three: Waters Corp., Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or FIW?
CGW holds 67 securities with 65.66% of its assets in the top 15. FIW has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.3%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGW & FIW
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
FIW
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
FIW
Advertisement
Advertisement
