Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CCORvsEQWLETF Comparison
Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) belongs to the Alternatives segment. Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. CCOR's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, EQWL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. CCOR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.29%, versus 0.3% for EQWL. CCOR is up 1.23% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. EQWL performs worse with 0.79% YTD performance, and +$313M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CCOR and EQWL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CCOR vs EQWL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCOR EQWL | -3.10%-2.85% | +0.25%+0.39% | +1.23%+0.79% | -0.86%+18.39% | -9.20%+70.06% | -2.84%+76.70% |
| Flows | CCOR EQWL | -$2M+$114M | -$6M+$366M | -$6M+$313M | -$34M+$1.01B | -$454M+$1.77B | -$78M+$1.86B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CCOR EQWL | +7.03%+9.23% | +11.61%+15.98% | +9.42%+13.03% | +10.51%+14.87% |
| Max drawdown | CCOR EQWL | -3.97%-2.99% | -10.16%-12.64% | -16.59%-15.14% | -22.75%-23.03% |
| Max drawdown duration | CCOR EQWL | 31d31d | 336d46d | 1093d110d | 1217d703d |
CCOR | EQWL | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 4:10 PM | $26.56 | $117.67 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $26.53 | $118.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CCOR | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CCOR | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.56 | $117.67 |
| 1D performance | +0.13% | -1.05% |
| AuM | $32.11 M | $2.32 B |
| E/R | 1.29% | 0.3% |
CCOR | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Core Alternative Capital | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 100 Equal Weight Index |
| N° of holdings | 38 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 24, 2017 | December 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CCOR and EQWL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CCOR is up 1.23% year-to-date (YTD), while EQWL has returned 0.79%. That puts CCOR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CCOR or EQWL?
Year-to-date, the CCOR ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to +$313M for EQWL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CCOR or EQWL?
Over the past year, CCOR had a volatility of 11.61%, while EQWL experienced 15.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: CCOR or EQWL?
As of March 11, 2026, CCOR holds $32.11 M in assets under management (AUM), while EQWL manages $2.32 B.
What sectors do the CCOR and EQWL ETFs invest in?
CCOR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, EQWL focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CCOR ETF and EQWL ETF?
CCOR top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, MORGAN STANLEY and MICROSOFT-T. EQWL holds in its top three: BOEING U, LOCKHEED MARTIN and PHILLIP MORRIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCOR or EQWL?
CCOR holds 38 securities with 52.55% of its assets in the top 15. EQWL has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.86%.
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Equal-Weight ETFs
Core Alternative ETF (NYSE Arca: CCOR)
Moving Beyond the 60/40 Convention
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
