CCNRvsPHOETF Comparison
VS
ALPS CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CCNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. CCNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.59% for PHO. CCNR is up 18.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$46M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with 0.03% YTD performance, and -$130M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CCNR and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CCNR vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCNR PHO | -3.86%+2.56% | +3.57%+0.25% | +18.38%+0.03% | +27.51%-3.30% | n/a+33.80% | n/a+27.90% |
| Flows | CCNR PHO | -$2M-$21M | +$9M-$68M | +$46M-$130M | -$27M-$171M | --$342M | --$432M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CCNR PHO | +14.31%+15.61% | +15.96%+15.70% | n/a+16.56% | n/a+18.39% |
| Max drawdown | CCNR PHO | -10.04%-7.48% | -12.80%-13.83% | n/a-19.26% | n/a-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | CCNR PHO | 37d68d | 99d360d | n/a250d | n/a715d |
Trading data
CCNR | PHO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 7:47 PM | $38.73 | $69.65 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $38.44 | $70.06 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CCNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCCNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 7:47 PM
Live
Closed
CCNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.73 | $69.65 |
| 1D performance | +0.76% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $440.33 M | $1.95 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.59% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CCNR
USA
29.68%
Canada
19.44%
Australia
11.97%
Japan
8%
Other
30.92%
PHO
USA
95.58%
Other
4.42%
Sectors
CCNR
Non-Energy Materi.
41.26%
Energy
33.38%
Industrials
7.57%
Utilities
7.47%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.33%
Other
2.99%
PHO
Industrials
44.74%
Healthcare
17.72%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.33%
Technology
14.97%
Utilities
7.24%
Other
0%
Diversification
CCNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
14.84%
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.12%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CCNR
Nutrien Ltd.
1.41%
Boliden AB
1.22%
Yara International ASA
1.14%
Equinor ASA
0.99%
Murphy Oil Corp.
0.98%
Baytex Energy Corp.
0.98%
Endeavour Mining Plc
0.96%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.94%
Corteva, Inc.
0.93%
Saipem SpA
0.92%
Regis Resources Ltd.
0.92%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
0.89%
EOG Resources, Inc.
0.86%
Chord Energy Corp.
0.86%
Eni SpA
0.84%
PHO
Roper Technologies, Inc.
9.56%
Ecolab, Inc.
8.22%
Waters Corp.
7.31%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
6.67%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
6.13%
Veralto Corp.
4.40%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
4.28%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.08%
Xylem, Inc.
3.79%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.64%
IDEX Corp.
3.62%
Trimble, Inc.
3.06%
Pentair plc
2.91%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
2.77%
AECOM
2.66%
Frequently asked questions about CCNR and PHO
How have the CCNR and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, CCNR is up 18.38% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has returned 0.03%. That puts CCNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CCNR or PHO?
Year-to-date, the CCNR ETF saw +$46M in flows, compared to -$130M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CCNR or PHO?
Over the past year, CCNR had a volatility of 15.96%, while PHO experienced 15.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: CCNR or PHO?
As of October 16, 2026, CCNR holds $440.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $1.95 B.
What sectors do the CCNR and PHO ETFs invest in?
CCNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CCNR ETF and PHO ETF?
CCNR top holdings include Nutrien Ltd., Boliden AB and Yara International ASA. PHO holds in its top three: Roper Technologies, Inc., Ecolab, Inc. and Waters Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CCNR or PHO?
CCNR holds 302 securities with 14.84% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.12%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CCNR & PHO
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
PHO
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
