CBLSvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.51%
Clough Hedged Equity ETF (CBLS) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CBLS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Energy and Utilities. In contrast, QDPL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. CBLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.89%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. CBLS is up 18.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. QDPL performs worse with 9.89% YTD performance, and +$140M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CBLS and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CBLS vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CBLS QDPL | +1.36%+1.80% | +11.22%+12.07% | +18.47%+9.89% | +15.82%+24.22% | +67.78%+70.10% | +25.60%n/a |
| Flows | CBLS QDPL | +$2M+$19M | +$4M+$72M | +$6M+$140M | +$7M+$473M | +$38M+$1.25B | +$37M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CBLS QDPL | +22.91%+14.22% | +16.25%+11.39% | +14.82%+13.52% | +15.95%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CBLS QDPL | -5.63%-5.08% | -8.08%-8.32% | -14.82%-17.47% | -31.24%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CBLS QDPL | 12d21d | 88d70d | 154d126d | 1150dn/a |
Trading data
CBLS | QDPL | |
Last sale 6/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.60 | $45.81 |
| Previous close 06/16/2026 | $33.27 | $46.09 |
| Consolidated volume 06/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CBLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCBLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CBLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.60 | $45.81 |
| 1D performance | -2.02% | -0.61% |
| AuM | $57.33 M | $1.66 B |
| E/R | 1.89% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
CBLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Clough Capital | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 53 | 490 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 13, 2020 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CBLS
USA
54.98%
Other
45.02%
QDPL
USA
96.1%
Other
3.9%
Sectors
CBLS
Information Techn.
40.41%
Energy
12.94%
Utilities
8.55%
Industrials
8.11%
Other
29.98%
QDPL
Information Techn.
32.77%
Communication Ser.
9.59%
Consumer Discreti.
9.09%
Financials
8.94%
Sovereign
8.78%
Health Care
7.43%
Other
23.4%
Advertisement
Diversification
CBLS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
69.21%
QDPL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.95%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
CBLS
SERVICE
5.01%
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS
4.89%
SITIME CORP
4.89%
KLA CORPORATION
4.84%
SCHLUMBERGER
4.82%
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.69%
HALLIBURTON
4.65%
US5128073062
4.62%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS
4.56%
OSCAR HEALTH
4.55%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP
4.43%
AMPHENOL
4.38%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
4.37%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
4.27%
ROLLINS
4.24%
QDPL
NVIDIA
7.71%
APPLE
5.75%
MICROSOFT-T
4.62%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.74%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.99%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.90%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.39%
META PLATFORMS
2.17%
TESLA
1.56%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.27%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.23%
LILLY
1.01%
EXXON
0.91%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
0.86%
USA, Notes 4.875% 31may2026, USD (BC-2026)
0.84%
Frequently asked questions about CBLS and QDPL
How have the CBLS and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 16, 2026, CBLS is up 18.47% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 9.89%. That puts CBLS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CBLS or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the CBLS ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$140M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CBLS or QDPL?
Over the past year, CBLS had a volatility of 16.25%, while QDPL experienced 11.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: CBLS or QDPL?
As of June 16, 2026, CBLS holds $57.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.66 B.
What sectors do the CBLS and QDPL ETFs invest in?
CBLS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Energy and Utilities. Meanwhile, QDPL focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CBLS ETF and QDPL ETF?
CBLS top holdings include SERVICE, MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS and SITIME CORP. QDPL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CBLS or QDPL?
CBLS holds 54 securities with 69.21% of its assets in the top 15. QDPL has 514 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.95%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CBLS & QDPL
Ask the Manager: Vince Lorusso on Active Equity in an AI-Driven Market
April 23, 2026
CBLS
Advertisement
Advertisement
