CBLSvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
+0.46%
Clough Hedged Equity ETF (CBLS) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CBLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.89%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. CBLS is up 10.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 12.73% YTD performance, and +$308M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CBLS and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CBLS vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CBLS QDPL | -2.29%+0.37% | -2.22%+3.79% | +10.05%+12.73% | +7.84%+12.68% | +63.89%+84.64% | +19.76%+73.91% |
| Flows | CBLS QDPL | -$598K+$28M | -$1M+$121M | +$7M+$308M | +$10M+$410M | +$38M+$1.38B | +$39M+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CBLS QDPL | +19.03%+10.17% | +18.55%+11.66% | +15.76%+13.49% | +16.31%+15.35% |
| Max drawdown | CBLS QDPL | -9.39%-2.82% | -14.69%-8.32% | -14.82%-17.47% | -31.24%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | CBLS QDPL | 21d53d | 145d70d | 154d126d | 1150d704d |
Trading data
CBLS | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.36 | $46.37 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $30.26 | $46.16 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CBLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCBLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CBLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.36 | $46.37 |
| 1D performance | +0.33% | +0.45% |
| AuM | $54.47 M | $1.85 B |
| E/R | 1.89% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
CBLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Clough Capital | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 13, 2020 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CBLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CBLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CBLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CBLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CBLS and QDPL
How have the CBLS and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, CBLS is up 10.05% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.73%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CBLS or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the CBLS ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$308M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CBLS or QDPL?
Over the past year, CBLS had a volatility of 18.55%, while QDPL experienced 11.66%.
Which ETF is bigger: CBLS or QDPL?
As of October 27, 2026, CBLS holds $54.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.85 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about CBLS & QDPL
Ask the Manager: Vince Lorusso on Active Equity in an AI-Driven Market
April 23, 2026
CBLS
Advertisement
Advertisement
