CANEvsPDBAETF Comparison
VS
Teucrium Sugar ETF (CANE) and Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) belong to the same industry segment: Agriculture. CANE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1%, versus 0.75% for PDBA. CANE is up 17.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$23M in YTD flows. PDBA performs worse with 7.49% YTD performance, and +$405M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CANE and PDBA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CANE vs PDBA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CANE PDBA | +2.78%-3.18% | +20.03%-1.03% | +17.86%+7.49% | +23.94%+8.00% | -23.77%+40.85% | +21.45%n/a |
| Flows | CANE PDBA | -$17M-$19M | -$41M+$162M | +$23M+$405M | +$25M+$405M | +$20M+$454M | +$8M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CANE PDBA | +24.70%+10.98% | +21.56%+10.65% | +21.59%+13.88% | +20.48%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CANE PDBA | -7.81%-7.07% | -14.76%-8.40% | -41.71%-11.53% | -41.71%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CANE PDBA | 12d56d | 134d105d | 1086d157d | 1086dn/a |
Trading data
CANE | PDBA | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $11.65 | $36.15 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $11.53 | $36.59 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PDBA
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCANE | PDBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CANE | PDBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $11.65 | $36.15 |
| 1D performance | +1.04% | -1.19% |
| AuM | $42.12 M | $455.39 M |
| E/R | 1% | 0.75% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CANE
Data will be available soon
PDBA
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CANE
Data will be available soon
PDBA
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CANE
Data will be available soon
PDBA
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CANE
Data will be available soon
PDBA
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CANE and PDBA
How have the CANE and PDBA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, CANE is up 17.86% year-to-date (YTD), while PDBA has returned 7.49%. That puts CANE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CANE or PDBA?
Year-to-date, the CANE ETF saw +$23M in flows, compared to +$405M for PDBA.
Which ETF is more volatile: CANE or PDBA?
Over the past year, CANE had a volatility of 21.56%, while PDBA experienced 10.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: CANE or PDBA?
As of October 27, 2026, CANE holds $42.12 M in assets under management (AUM), while PDBA manages $455.39 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about CANE & PDBA
Agriculture Funds Drop After Deere & Co.'s Revised Forecast
May 20, 2024
CANE
PDBA
Agricultural ETFs and Current Developments Occurring Within the Agricultural Commodities Landscape
September 26, 2023
CANE
Diversify Your Portfolio with Agriculture Commodities
March 21, 2023
CANE
2023 Commodity Market Outlook
January 24, 2023
CANE
Advertisement
Advertisement
