CAIQvsFTMNETF Comparison
Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. CAIQ's top 1 sector exposures are Sovereign. In contrast, FTMN's top sector exposures are Municipal. CAIQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.86%, versus 0.35% for FTMN. CAIQ is up 12.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$306M in YTD flows. FTMN performs worse with -2.6% YTD performance, and +$122M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CAIQ and FTMN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CAIQ vs FTMN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CAIQ FTMN | -0.12%-1.54% | +0.47%-3.43% | +12.74%-2.60% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CAIQ FTMN | +$48M+$99M | +$140M+$97M | +$306M+$122M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CAIQ FTMN | +11.79%+3.46% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CAIQ FTMN | -5.79%-3.95% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CAIQ FTMN | 58d66d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
CAIQ | FTMN | |
Last sale 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.54 | $8.54 |
| Previous close 09/04/2026 | $25.55 | $8.56 |
| Consolidated volume 09/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CAIQ | FTMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.54 | $8.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $342.84 M | $287.89 M |
| E/R | 0.86% | 0.35% |
CAIQ | FTMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Calamos Investments | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 2 | 24 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 20, 2025 | November 10, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 2 holdings out of 2
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
