CAIEvsFTMNETF Comparison
Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) and Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. CAIE's top 1 sector exposures are Sovereign. In contrast, FTMN's top sector exposures are Municipal. CAIE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.74%, versus 0.35% for FTMN. CAIE is up 10.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$787M in YTD flows. FTMN performs worse with -3.15% YTD performance, and +$114M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CAIE and FTMN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CAIE vs FTMN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CAIE FTMN | -1.01%-2.53% | +2.61%-3.91% | +10.25%-3.15% | +15.84%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CAIE FTMN | +$103M+$90M | +$354M+$89M | +$787M+$114M | +$1.14B- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CAIE FTMN | +10.12%+3.61% | +11.08%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CAIE FTMN | -3.02%-4.50% | -7.22%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CAIE FTMN | 16d71d | 91dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
CAIE | FTMN | |
Last sale 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.36 | $8.42 |
| Previous close 09/09/2026 | $26.59 | $8.49 |
| Consolidated volume 09/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CAIE | FTMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.36 | $8.42 |
| 1D performance | -0.86% | -0.82% |
| AuM | $1.30 B | $278.16 M |
| E/R | 0.74% | 0.35% |
CAIE | FTMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Calamos Investments | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 2 | 24 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2025 | November 10, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 2 holdings out of 2
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15