BTALvsCLSEETF Comparison
VS
AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. BTAL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.65%, versus 1.52% for CLSE. BTAL is down -7.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$82M in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 22.03% YTD performance, and +$670M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BTAL and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BTAL vs CLSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BTAL CLSE | +10.48%-1.55% | +11.26%-1.87% | -7.42%+22.03% | -10.82%+29.00% | -27.46%+111.52% | -8.79%n/a |
| Flows | BTAL CLSE | -$4M+$66M | +$18M+$251M | +$82M+$670M | +$6M+$701M | +$213M+$858M | +$408M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BTAL CLSE | +20.89%+9.17% | +22.64%+13.05% | +19.70%+13.48% | +19.31%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BTAL CLSE | -6.86%-3.35% | -29.28%-4.60% | -47.61%-15.76% | -47.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BTAL CLSE | 76d10d | 337d40d | 568d188d | 568dn/a |
Trading data
BTAL | CLSE | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $13.30 | $33.37 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $13.31 | $33.40 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BTAL | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $13.30 | $33.37 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $347.90 M | $1.02 B |
| E/R | 1.65% | 1.52% |
Characteristics
BTAL | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AGF | Convergence Investment Partners LLC |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2011 | February 22, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BTAL
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Sectors
BTAL
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
BTAL
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BTAL
Data will be available soon
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BTAL and CLSE
How have the BTAL and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, BTAL is down -7.42% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 22.03%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BTAL or CLSE?
Year-to-date, the BTAL ETF saw +$82M in flows, compared to +$670M for CLSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: BTAL or CLSE?
Over the past year, BTAL had a volatility of 22.64%, while CLSE experienced 13.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: BTAL or CLSE?
As of October 23, 2026, BTAL holds $347.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $1.02 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about BTAL & CLSE
Diversify Your Diversifiers with the AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL)
October 2, 2025
BTAL
What's the Fund | AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL)
May 22, 2025
BTAL
Advertisement
Advertisement
