BMARvsQQQIETF Comparison
VS
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. BMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. BMAR is up 11.72% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. QQQI performs worse with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$7.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BMAR and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BMAR vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BMAR QQQI | +1.27%+0.65% | +2.33%+1.01% | +11.72%+10.72% | +15.57%+14.06% | +60.44%n/a | +75.54%n/a |
| Flows | BMAR QQQI | -$3K+$447M | -$51M+$2.14B | +$5M+$7.55B | -$4M+$9.46B | +$30M- | +$50M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BMAR QQQI | +5.82%+16.13% | +7.53%+16.85% | +10.04%n/a | +11.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BMAR QQQI | -1.37%-6.64% | -5.52%-9.62% | -12.52%n/a | -15.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BMAR QQQI | 14d13d | 43d76d | 106dn/a | 414dn/a |
Trading data
BMAR | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.25 | $53.62 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $59.62 | $54.90 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BMAR | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.25 | $53.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.62% | -2.33% |
| AuM | $204.50 M | $14.89 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
BMAR | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 2, 2020 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
BMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
BMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BMAR and QQQI
How have the BMAR and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, BMAR is up 11.72% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has returned 10.72%. That puts BMAR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BMAR or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the BMAR ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$7.55B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: BMAR or QQQI?
Over the past year, BMAR had a volatility of 7.53%, while QQQI experienced 16.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: BMAR or QQQI?
As of October 16, 2026, BMAR holds $204.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $14.89 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about BMAR & QQQI
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
QQQI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
QQQI
Advertisement
Advertisement
