BMARvsDIVOETF Comparison
VS
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. BMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.56% for DIVO. BMAR is up 11.72% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. DIVO performs worse with 11.4% YTD performance, and +$1.73B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BMAR and DIVO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BMAR vs DIVO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BMAR DIVO | +1.27%+2.03% | +2.33%+3.64% | +11.72%+11.40% | +15.57%+16.33% | +60.44%+60.32% | +75.54%+70.24% |
| Flows | BMAR DIVO | -$3K+$113M | -$51M+$375M | +$5M+$1.73B | -$4M+$2.24B | +$30M+$3.73B | +$50M+$5.98B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BMAR DIVO | +5.82%+8.36% | +7.53%+9.37% | +10.04%+10.63% | +11.49%+11.80% |
| Max drawdown | BMAR DIVO | -1.37%-4.23% | -5.52%-5.92% | -12.52%-12.14% | -15.04%-13.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | BMAR DIVO | 14d43d | 43d114d | 106d130d | 414d329d |
Trading data
BMAR | DIVO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.25 | $47.81 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $59.62 | $47.81 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BMAR | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.25 | $47.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.62% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $204.50 M | $8.01 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
BMAR | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 2, 2020 | December 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BMAR
Data will be available soon
DIVO
Data will be available soon
Sectors
BMAR
Data will be available soon
DIVO
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
BMAR
Data will be available soon
DIVO
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BMAR
Data will be available soon
DIVO
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BMAR and DIVO
How have the BMAR and DIVO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, BMAR is up 11.72% year-to-date (YTD), while DIVO has returned 11.4%. That puts BMAR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BMAR or DIVO?
Year-to-date, the BMAR ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$1.73B for DIVO.
Which ETF is more volatile: BMAR or DIVO?
Over the past year, BMAR had a volatility of 7.53%, while DIVO experienced 9.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: BMAR or DIVO?
As of October 16, 2026, BMAR holds $204.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while DIVO manages $8.01 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about BMAR & DIVO
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
DIVO
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
January 23, 2025
DIVO
Advertisement
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 2: Covered Call ETFs
November 8, 2023
DIVO
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 2: Covered Call ETFs
November 8, 2023
DIVO
Advertisement
