Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BKLCvsONOFETF Comparison
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. BKLC is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$382M in YTD flows. ONOF performs worse with -0.95% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BKLC and ONOF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BKLC vs ONOF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BKLC ONOF | -2.24%-2.13% | -0.67%-1.60% | -0.69%-0.95% | +22.90%+13.04% | +87.66%+46.26% | +90.64%+56.28% |
| Flows | BKLC ONOF | +$197M+$3M | +$414M+$4M | +$382M+$2M | +$1.58B+$5M | +$2.26B+$39M | +$3.72B+$52M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BKLC ONOF | +11.86%+11.79% | +18.43%+17.24% | +15.14%+14.17% | +17.54%+14.46% |
| Max drawdown | BKLC ONOF | -3.45%-3.48% | -13.92%-13.89% | -19.17%-21.66% | -26.14%-25.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | BKLC ONOF | 41d57d | 45d91d | 126d205d | 707d756d |
BKLC | ONOF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $129.41 | $37.19 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $129.50 | $37.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BKLC | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BKLC | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $129.41 | $37.19 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $5.27 B | $142.62 M |
| E/R | 0% | 0.39% |
BKLC | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | BNY Mellon | Global X |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 500 Index | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index |
| N° of holdings | 470 | 470 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 7, 2020 | January 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BKLC and ONOF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, BKLC is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD), while ONOF has lost -0.95%. That puts BKLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BKLC or ONOF?
Year-to-date, the BKLC ETF saw +$382M in flows, compared to +$2M for ONOF.
Which ETF is more volatile: BKLC or ONOF?
Over the past year, BKLC had a volatility of 18.43%, while ONOF experienced 17.24%.
Which ETF is bigger: BKLC or ONOF?
As of March 9, 2026, BKLC holds $5.27 B in assets under management (AUM), while ONOF manages $142.62 M.
What sectors do the BKLC and ONOF ETFs invest in?
BKLC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ONOF focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BKLC ETF and ONOF ETF?
BKLC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ONOF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BKLC or ONOF?
BKLC holds 504 securities with 42.93% of its assets in the top 15. ONOF has 504 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.08%.
State Street Global Advisors' 2024 US ETF Impact Survey: Key Takeaways and ETFs to Watch
Meet the Ultra-Affordable, Zero-Expense Ratio ETFs from BNY Mellon
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
