Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BKLCvsGSUSETF Comparison
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. BKLC is down -0.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$388M in YTD flows. GSUS performs worse with -1.08% YTD performance, and -$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BKLC and GSUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BKLC vs GSUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BKLC GSUS | -2.12%-2.09% | -1.54%-1.69% | -0.90%-1.08% | +22.65%+22.50% | +89.65%+84.71% | +89.38%+83.90% |
| Flows | BKLC GSUS | +$199M-$543K | +$419M-$15M | +$388M-$10M | +$1.58B+$6M | +$2.27B+$1.10B | +$3.73B+$1.55B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BKLC GSUS | +11.78%+11.62% | +18.40%+18.34% | +15.12%+14.95% | +17.54%+17.36% |
| Max drawdown | BKLC GSUS | -3.45%-3.51% | -13.92%-13.91% | -19.17%-19.14% | -26.14%-25.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | BKLC GSUS | 42d57d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 707d715d |
BKLC | GSUS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 3:14 PM | $127.62 | $92.28 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $129.41 | $93.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BKLC | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BKLC | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $127.62 | $92.28 |
| 1D performance | -1.38% | -1.11% |
| AuM | $5.27 B | $2.94 B |
| E/R | 0% | 0.09% |
BKLC | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | BNY Mellon | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 500 Index | Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 470 | 400 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 7, 2020 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BKLC and GSUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, BKLC is down -0.9% year-to-date (YTD), while GSUS has lost -1.08%. That puts BKLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BKLC or GSUS?
Year-to-date, the BKLC ETF saw +$388M in flows, compared to -$10M for GSUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: BKLC or GSUS?
Over the past year, BKLC had a volatility of 18.4%, while GSUS experienced 18.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: BKLC or GSUS?
As of March 10, 2026, BKLC holds $5.27 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSUS manages $2.94 B.
What sectors do the BKLC and GSUS ETFs invest in?
BKLC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSUS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BKLC ETF and GSUS ETF?
BKLC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GSUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BKLC or GSUS?
BKLC holds 504 securities with 42.93% of its assets in the top 15. GSUS has 419 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.2%.
State Street Global Advisors' 2024 US ETF Impact Survey: Key Takeaways and ETFs to Watch
Meet the Ultra-Affordable, Zero-Expense Ratio ETFs from BNY Mellon
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
