BKFvsFLCHETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI BIC ETF (BKF) belongs to the EM Large & Mid Cap segment. Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is part of the China Blended Cap segment. BKF's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, FLCH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. BKF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.72%, versus 0.19% for FLCH. BKF is down -14.48% year-to-date (YTD) with -$16M in YTD flows. FLCH performs worse with -18.13% YTD performance, and +$34M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BKF and FLCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BKF vs FLCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BKF FLCH | -4.63%-6.93% | -9.42%-11.32% | -14.48%-18.13% | -16.89%-22.46% | +19.85%+26.24% | -16.45%-19.01% |
| Flows | BKF FLCH | --$33M | -$8M-$14M | -$16M+$34M | -$12M+$82M | -$14M+$150M | -$52M+$176M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BKF FLCH | +12.84%+14.74% | +14.29%+18.91% | +16.31%+23.09% | +19.70%+26.33% |
| Max drawdown | BKF FLCH | -10.44%-13.93% | -17.87%-23.91% | -17.87%-25.26% | -39.18%-48.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | BKF FLCH | 81d81d | 274d274d | 368d393d | 1400d1395d |
Trading data
BKF | FLCH | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.26 | $19.45 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $37.31 | $19.35 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BKF | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BKF | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.26 | $19.45 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | +0.52% |
| AuM | $63.32 M | $251.99 M |
| E/R | 0.72% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
BKF | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI EM BIC Index | FTSE China RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 637 | 927 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 12, 2007 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BKF
China
51.1%
India
30.7%
Brazil
11.62%
Other
6.59%
FLCH
China
91.51%
Other
8.49%
Sectors
BKF
Finance
27.37%
Technology
17.96%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.72%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.71%
Industrials
7.52%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.31%
Other
21.43%
FLCH
Technology
25.43%
Finance
22.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.71%
Industrials
7.44%
Other
29.26%
Advertisement
Diversification
BKF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.07%
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
BKF
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
7.89%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
5.34%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.49%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
1.99%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
1.73%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.66%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.50%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
1.40%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.28%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.22%
Bharti Airtel Ltd.
1.19%
Vale SA
1.15%
Nu Holdings Ltd.
1.08%
Meituan
1.08%
Itaú Unibanco Holding SA
1.07%
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.79%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
9.65%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.94%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.82%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.20%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.09%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.90%
Meituan
1.85%
NetEase, Inc.
1.54%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.48%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.35%
JD.com, Inc.
1.20%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
1.00%
WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc.
0.93%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
0.90%
Frequently asked questions about BKF and FLCH
How have the BKF and FLCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, BKF is down -14.48% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCH has lost -18.13%. That puts BKF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BKF or FLCH?
Year-to-date, the BKF ETF saw -$16M in flows, compared to +$34M for FLCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: BKF or FLCH?
Over the past year, BKF had a volatility of 14.29%, while FLCH experienced 18.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: BKF or FLCH?
As of October 30, 2026, BKF holds $63.32 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCH manages $251.99 M.
What sectors do the BKF and FLCH ETFs invest in?
BKF leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, FLCH focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the BKF ETF and FLCH ETF?
BKF top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp.. FLCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: BKF or FLCH?
BKF holds 686 securities with 32.07% of its assets in the top 15. FLCH has 1030 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.62%.
Advertisement
Latest news about BKF & FLCH
There's an ETF for that? Investing in BRICS Countries
October 31, 2024
BKF
There’s an ETF for That? Betting Against the U.S. Dollar
September 27, 2024
BKF
Advertisement
Advertisement
