Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AGNGvsHRTSETF Comparison
Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) belongs to the New Consumers & Focus segment. Tema GLP-1, Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) is part of the Tomorrow's Treatments segment. AGNG's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care and Real Estate. In contrast, HRTS's top sector exposures are Health Care AGNG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.99% for HRTS. AGNG is up 1.36% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. HRTS performs worse with -2.17% YTD performance, and -$713K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AGNG and HRTS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AGNG vs HRTS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AGNG HRTS | -3.76%-2.82% | +1.69%-1.29% | +1.36%-2.17% | +17.03%+18.66% | +44.51%n/a | +36.62%n/a |
| Flows | AGNG HRTS | +$2M-$2M | +$15M+$712K | +$12M-$713K | +$15M-$17M | +$3M- | +$30M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AGNG HRTS | +10.89%+13.97% | +13.18%+17.56% | +11.50%n/a | +13.48%n/a |
| Max drawdown | AGNG HRTS | -5.27%-6.15% | -10.62%-13.50% | -13.73%n/a | -25.40%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | AGNG HRTS | 10d63d | 80d163d | 323dn/a | 1041dn/a |
AGNG | HRTS | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.43 | $34.55 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $36.67 | $34.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AGNG | HRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AGNG | HRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.43 | $34.55 |
| 1D performance | -0.66% | -0.65% |
| AuM | $84.61 M | $52.88 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.99% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AGNG and HRTS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, AGNG is up 1.36% year-to-date (YTD), while HRTS has lost -2.17%. That puts AGNG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AGNG or HRTS?
Year-to-date, the AGNG ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to -$713K for HRTS.
Which ETF is more volatile: AGNG or HRTS?
Over the past year, AGNG had a volatility of 13.18%, while HRTS experienced 17.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: AGNG or HRTS?
As of March 11, 2026, AGNG holds $84.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while HRTS manages $52.88 M.
What sectors do the AGNG and HRTS ETFs invest in?
AGNG leans toward sectors like Health Care and Real Estate. Meanwhile, HRTS focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the AGNG ETF and HRTS ETF?
AGNG top holdings include UCB, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and ROCHE. HRTS holds in its top three: LILLY, US7711951043 and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: AGNG or HRTS?
AGNG holds 80 securities with 46.72% of its assets in the top 15. HRTS has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.09%.
Obesity and Weight-Loss Drugs: A New Thematic ETF Segment?
Investing in the Aging Demographics Megatrend
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
