ACVFvsRECSETF Comparison
VS
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. ACVF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.15% for RECS. ACVF is up 9.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with 7.73% YTD performance, and +$708M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACVF and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACVF vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACVF RECS | -1.47%+1.70% | +4.32%+4.49% | +9.12%+7.73% | +12.32%+17.19% | +57.24%+69.81% | +70.40%+86.89% |
| Flows | ACVF RECS | -+$39M | -$25K+$230M | +$3M+$708M | +$4M+$1.99B | +$49M+$4.54B | +$88M+$4.71B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACVF RECS | +14.05%+11.06% | +12.54%+12.12% | +14.44%+14.59% | +16.70%+16.58% |
| Max drawdown | ACVF RECS | -4.23%-3.45% | -7.72%-8.79% | -16.69%-18.49% | -24.54%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACVF RECS | 58d34d | 48d66d | 110d126d | 709d573d |
Trading data
ACVF | RECS | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 7:20 PM | $53.71 | $43.48 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $52.82 | $43.96 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACVF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexACVF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 7:20 PM
Live
Closed
ACVF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.71 | $43.48 |
| 1D performance | +1.67% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $151.73 M | $5.90 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
ACVF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Ridgeline Research | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 381 | 444 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 29, 2020 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACVF
USA
94.44%
Other
5.56%
RECS
USA
98.76%
Other
1.24%
Sectors
ACVF
Technology
40.77%
Finance
12.04%
Industrials
9.4%
Healthcare
8.18%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.09%
Other
22.52%
RECS
Technology
43.15%
Finance
13.39%
Industrials
8.19%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.07%
Healthcare
7.88%
Other
19.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACVF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.5%
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ACVF
NVIDIA Corp.
7.68%
Microsoft Corp.
4.01%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.94%
Broadcom Inc.
2.62%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.98%
Walmart, Inc.
1.74%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.73%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.73%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.62%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.61%
Corning, Inc.
1.48%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.38%
Tesla, Inc.
1.36%
US30233Q1085
1.35%
Lam Research Corp.
1.27%
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
11.49%
Apple, Inc.
10.88%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.44%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.82%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.23%
Bank of America Corp.
1.94%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.56%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.33%
Chevron Corp.
1.29%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.21%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.15%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.13%
Lam Research Corp.
1.10%
CVS Health Corp.
1.09%
Starbucks Corp.
1.05%
Frequently asked questions about ACVF and RECS
How have the ACVF and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, ACVF is up 9.12% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has returned 7.73%. That puts ACVF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACVF or RECS?
Year-to-date, the ACVF ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$708M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACVF or RECS?
Over the past year, ACVF had a volatility of 12.54%, while RECS experienced 12.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACVF or RECS?
As of July 30, 2026, ACVF holds $151.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $5.90 B.
What sectors do the ACVF and RECS ETFs invest in?
ACVF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ACVF ETF and RECS ETF?
ACVF top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Cisco Systems, Inc.. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACVF or RECS?
ACVF holds 388 securities with 34.5% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 454 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.71%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ACVF & RECS
There’s an ETF for That? America First
February 11, 2025
ACVF
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
November 6, 2024
ACVF
Advertisement
Advertisement
