ACVFvsNULCETF Comparison
VS
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. ACVF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, NULC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. ACVF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.21% for NULC. ACVF is up 9.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. NULC performs better with 12.74% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACVF and NULC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACVF vs NULC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACVF NULC | -1.47%-0.41% | +4.32%+4.18% | +9.12%+12.74% | +12.32%+17.49% | +57.24%+64.48% | +70.40%+58.72% |
| Flows | ACVF NULC | -+$5M | -$25K+$10M | +$3M+$13M | +$4M+$16M | +$49M+$31M | +$88M+$32M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACVF NULC | +14.05%+14.10% | +12.54%+13.59% | +14.44%+15.16% | +16.70%+17.22% |
| Max drawdown | ACVF NULC | -4.23%-4.99% | -7.72%-9.01% | -16.69%-18.49% | -24.54%-29.63% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACVF NULC | 58d58d | 48d75d | 110d203d | 709d835d |
Trading data
ACVF | NULC | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 7:20 PM | $53.71 | $53.78 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $52.82 | $53.89 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACVF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexACVF | NULC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 7:20 PM
Live
Closed
ACVF | NULC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.71 | $53.78 |
| 1D performance | +1.67% | -0.21% |
| AuM | $151.73 M | $70.07 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.21% |
Characteristics
ACVF | NULC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Ridgeline Research | Nuveen |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 381 | 136 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 29, 2020 | June 4, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACVF
USA
94.44%
Other
5.56%
NULC
USA
96.12%
Other
3.88%
Sectors
ACVF
Technology
40.77%
Finance
12.04%
Industrials
9.4%
Healthcare
8.18%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.09%
Other
22.52%
NULC
Technology
45.37%
Finance
11.87%
Healthcare
9.89%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.8%
Industrials
8.31%
Other
15.76%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACVF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.5%
NULC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.07%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ACVF
NVIDIA Corp.
7.68%
Microsoft Corp.
4.01%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.94%
Broadcom Inc.
2.62%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.98%
Walmart, Inc.
1.74%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.73%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.73%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.62%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.61%
Corning, Inc.
1.48%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.38%
Tesla, Inc.
1.36%
US30233Q1085
1.35%
Lam Research Corp.
1.27%
NULC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.07%
Broadcom Inc.
3.67%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.11%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.99%
Microsoft Corp.
2.92%
Lam Research Corp.
2.18%
Western Digital Corp.
2.01%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.92%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.89%
GE Vernova, Inc.
1.86%
Visa, Inc.
1.82%
Morgan Stanley
1.69%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.66%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.65%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.64%
Frequently asked questions about ACVF and NULC
How have the ACVF and NULC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, ACVF is up 9.12% year-to-date (YTD), while NULC has returned 12.74%. That puts NULC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACVF or NULC?
Year-to-date, the ACVF ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$13M for NULC.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACVF or NULC?
Over the past year, ACVF had a volatility of 12.54%, while NULC experienced 13.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACVF or NULC?
As of July 30, 2026, ACVF holds $151.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while NULC manages $70.07 M.
What sectors do the ACVF and NULC ETFs invest in?
ACVF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, NULC focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the ACVF ETF and NULC ETF?
ACVF top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Cisco Systems, Inc.. NULC holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Broadcom Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACVF or NULC?
ACVF holds 388 securities with 34.5% of its assets in the top 15. NULC has 136 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.07%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ACVF & NULC
There’s an ETF for That? America First
February 11, 2025
ACVF
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
November 6, 2024
ACVF
Advertisement
Advertisement
