ACVFvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. ACVF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, IWB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. ACVF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.15% for IWB. ACVF is up 12.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. IWB performs better with 13.39% YTD performance, and -$2.80B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACVF and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACVF vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACVF IWB | +1.57%+0.66% | +3.92%+4.17% | +12.83%+13.39% | +11.04%+12.96% | +77.82%+93.10% | +68.77%+75.20% |
| Flows | ACVF IWB | +$10K-$104M | -$1M-$660M | +$1M-$2.80B | +$2M-$1.07B | +$40M-$2.81B | +$72M-$2.80B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACVF IWB | +11.25%+11.25% | +12.66%+12.85% | +14.32%+15.10% | +16.63%+17.29% |
| Max drawdown | ACVF IWB | -5.09%-3.22% | -7.72%-8.86% | -16.69%-19.16% | -24.54%-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACVF IWB | 75d53d | 48d76d | 110d126d | 709d709d |
Trading data
ACVF | IWB | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.56 | $421.72 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $55.50 | $420.41 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACVF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexACVF | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ACVF | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.56 | $421.72 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | +0.31% |
| AuM | $155.34 M | $48.98 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
ACVF | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Ridgeline Research | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 384 | 1007 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 29, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACVF
USA
95.39%
Other
4.61%
IWB
USA
97.62%
Other
2.38%
Sectors
ACVF
Technology
40.24%
Finance
12.59%
Industrials
9.03%
Healthcare
8.65%
Other
29.49%
IWB
Technology
42.97%
Finance
14.31%
Healthcare
9.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.59%
Industrials
8.08%
Other
16.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACVF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.49%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
ACVF
NVIDIA Corp.
8.31%
Microsoft Corp.
5.34%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.71%
Broadcom Inc.
2.52%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.63%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.60%
Walmart, Inc.
1.58%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.56%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.55%
Arista Networks, Inc.
1.39%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.28%
Tesla, Inc.
1.17%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.14%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.08%
IWB
NVIDIA Corp.
7.26%
Apple, Inc.
6.45%
Microsoft Corp.
5.31%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Broadcom Inc.
2.43%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.25%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.77%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.52%
Tesla, Inc.
1.51%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.34%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.32%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.30%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.08%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.94%
Frequently asked questions about ACVF and IWB
How have the ACVF and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, ACVF is up 12.83% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 13.39%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACVF or IWB?
Year-to-date, the ACVF ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to -$2.80B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACVF or IWB?
Over the past year, ACVF had a volatility of 12.66%, while IWB experienced 12.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACVF or IWB?
As of October 27, 2026, ACVF holds $155.34 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $48.98 B.
What sectors do the ACVF and IWB ETFs invest in?
ACVF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the ACVF ETF and IWB ETF?
ACVF top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Cisco Systems, Inc.. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACVF or IWB?
ACVF holds 387 securities with 34.49% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1018 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.83%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ACVF & IWB
There’s an ETF for That? America First
February 11, 2025
ACVF
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
November 6, 2024
ACVF
Advertisement
Advertisement
