Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ACVFvsFVALETF Comparison
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. ACVF's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, FVAL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. ACVF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.15% for FVAL. ACVF is up 0% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. FVAL performs worse with -0.67% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACVF and FVAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ACVF vs FVAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACVF FVAL | -2.04%-3.08% | -0.50%-0.54% | +0.00%-0.67% | +16.31%+23.11% | +69.87%+73.66% | +75.52%+76.80% |
| Flows | ACVF FVAL | -+$12M | +$1M+$944K | -+$19M | +$2M-$32M | +$59M+$304M | +$93M+$466M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACVF FVAL | +12.08%+10.93% | +16.80%+17.65% | +14.29%+14.22% | +16.52%+16.33% |
| Max drawdown | ACVF FVAL | -3.24%-3.59% | -12.32%-13.50% | -16.69%-18.14% | -24.54%-23.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACVF FVAL | 9d37d | 46d45d | 110d131d | 709d702d |
ACVF | FVAL | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.52 | $70.86 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $49.25 | $71.84 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ACVF | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ACVF | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.52 | $70.86 |
| 1D performance | -1.47% | -1.37% |
| AuM | $136.97 M | $1.12 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.15% |
ACVF | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Ridgeline Research | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 349 | 121 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 29, 2020 | September 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ACVF and FVAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, ACVF is up 0% year-to-date (YTD), while FVAL has lost -0.67%. That puts ACVF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACVF or FVAL?
Year-to-date, the ACVF ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$19M for FVAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACVF or FVAL?
Over the past year, ACVF had a volatility of 16.8%, while FVAL experienced 17.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACVF or FVAL?
As of March 10, 2026, ACVF holds $136.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while FVAL manages $1.12 B.
What sectors do the ACVF and FVAL ETFs invest in?
ACVF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, FVAL focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ACVF ETF and FVAL ETF?
ACVF top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and BROADCOM LIMITED. FVAL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACVF or FVAL?
ACVF holds 361 securities with 32.03% of its assets in the top 15. FVAL has 125 securities and a top 15 weight of 46.71%.
There’s an ETF for That? America First
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
