Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ACVFvsDSPYETF Comparison
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. ACVF's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, DSPY's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. ACVF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.18% for DSPY. ACVF is up 0% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. DSPY performs better with 0.92% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACVF and DSPY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ACVF vs DSPY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACVF DSPY | -2.04%-2.32% | -0.50%+0.16% | +0.00%+0.92% | +16.31%n/a | +69.87%n/a | +75.52%n/a |
| Flows | ACVF DSPY | -- | +$1M-$523K | -+$2M | +$2M- | +$59M- | +$93M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACVF DSPY | +12.08%+10.88% | +16.80%n/a | +14.29%n/a | +16.52%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ACVF DSPY | -3.24%-2.61% | -12.32%n/a | -16.69%n/a | -24.54%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ACVF DSPY | 9d14d | 46dn/a | 110dn/a | 709dn/a |
ACVF | DSPY | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.52 | $57.94 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $49.25 | $58.79 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
ACVF | DSPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.52 | $57.94 |
| 1D performance | -1.47% | -1.44% |
| AuM | $136.97 M | $788.12 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.18% |
ACVF | DSPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Ridgeline Research | Tema |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 349 | 475 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 29, 2020 | March 31, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ACVF and DSPY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, ACVF is up 0% year-to-date (YTD), while DSPY has returned 0.92%. That puts DSPY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACVF or DSPY?
Year-to-date, the ACVF ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$2M for DSPY.
Which ETF is bigger: ACVF or DSPY?
As of March 10, 2026, ACVF holds $136.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while DSPY manages $788.12 M.
What sectors do the ACVF and DSPY ETFs invest in?
ACVF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, DSPY focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the ACVF ETF and DSPY ETF?
ACVF top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and BROADCOM LIMITED. DSPY holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACVF or DSPY?
ACVF holds 361 securities with 32.03% of its assets in the top 15. DSPY has 497 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.21%.
There’s an ETF for That? America First
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
