ACESvsURNMETF Comparison
VS
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ACES's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials. ACES is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.75% for URNM. ACES is down -6.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. URNM performs worse with -11.88% YTD performance, and +$317M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACES and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACES vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACES URNM | -12.61%-8.80% | -13.06%-27.23% | -6.26%-11.88% | +7.69%+3.40% | -34.02%+59.07% | -55.36%+95.06% |
| Flows | ACES URNM | -$2M+$5M | +$2M+$17M | +$10M+$317M | +$8M+$163M | -$200M+$527M | -$322M+$1.20B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACES URNM | +38.61%+43.18% | +34.70%+42.90% | +34.78%+36.59% | +36.49%+40.99% |
| Max drawdown | ACES URNM | -29.03%-29.54% | -29.03%-41.76% | -57.14%-50.18% | -74.39%-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACES URNM | 56d78d | 56d181d | 1093d485d | 1730d485d |
Trading data
ACES | URNM | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.54 | $47.21 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $30.51 | $48.36 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACES | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ACES | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.54 | $47.21 |
| 1D performance | -3.18% | -2.38% |
| AuM | $108.79 M | $1.76 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
ACES | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ALPS | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 38 | 26 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 27, 2018 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACES
USA
85.31%
Canada
9.61%
Other
5.09%
URNM
Canada
53.28%
USA
14.34%
Australia
14.3%
Other
18.08%
Sectors
ACES
Industrials
36.16%
Utilities
26.81%
Consumer Cyclical.
13.11%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.26%
Other
15.65%
URNM
Energy
70.79%
Non-Corporate
13.23%
Industrials
7.82%
Other
8.16%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACES
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.02%
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
86.04%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ACES
Tesla, Inc.
5.76%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.69%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
5.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
5.10%
Nextpower, Inc.
4.86%
Northland Power, Inc.
4.85%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.71%
Albemarle Corp.
4.66%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
4.61%
First Solar, Inc.
4.53%
Itron, Inc.
4.45%
Plug Power, Inc.
4.43%
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
4.18%
Sunrun, Inc.
3.65%
Boralex, Inc.
3.13%
URNM
Cameco Corp.
17.17%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
13.23%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
11.35%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.88%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.85%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.85%
Deep Yellow Ltd.
4.38%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.26%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.16%
CGN Mining Co. Ltd.
4.04%
Yellow Cake Plc
3.78%
Ur-Energy, Inc.
2.88%
Bannerman Energy Ltd.
2.39%
IsoEnergy Ltd.
2.22%
Boss Energy Ltd.
1.60%
Frequently asked questions about ACES and URNM
How have the ACES and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, ACES is down -6.26% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has lost -11.88%. That puts ACES better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACES or URNM?
Year-to-date, the ACES ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$317M for URNM.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACES or URNM?
Over the past year, ACES had a volatility of 34.7%, while URNM experienced 42.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACES or URNM?
As of July 28, 2026, ACES holds $108.79 M in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $1.76 B.
What sectors do the ACES and URNM ETFs invest in?
ACES leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ACES ETF and URNM ETF?
ACES top holdings include Tesla, Inc., Rivian Automotive, Inc. and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.. URNM holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACES or URNM?
ACES holds 38 securities with 70.02% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 86.04%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ACES & URNM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
URNM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URNM
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
February 8, 2024
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
February 8, 2024
URNM
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URNM
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
URNM
Advertisement
