AAACvsCAIQETF Comparison
Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. AAAC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Corporate and Finance. In contrast, CAIQ's top sector exposures are Sovereign. AAAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.86% for CAIQ. AAAC is up 3.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$93M in YTD flows. CAIQ performs better with 11.24% YTD performance, and +$312M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AAAC and CAIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AAAC vs CAIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AAAC CAIQ | +0.46%-1.30% | +1.26%-0.12% | +3.48%+11.24% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | AAAC CAIQ | -+$50M | +$93M+$142M | +$93M+$312M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AAAC CAIQ | +0.26%+11.84% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | AAAC CAIQ | n/a-5.79% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | AAAC CAIQ | n/a58d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
AAAC | CAIQ | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:46 PM | $20.09 | $25.21 |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $20.09 | $25.40 |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
AAAC | CAIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.09 | $25.21 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.77% |
| AuM | $103.40 M | $343.93 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.86% |
AAAC | CAIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Calamos Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 17 | 2 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2025 | November 20, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 2 holdings out of 2
