XTvsNZACETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
NZAC
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
iShares Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) belongs to the Disruptive Technology segment. State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is part of the segment. XT's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, NZAC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. XT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.46%, versus 0.12% for NZAC. XT is up 16.04% year-to-date (YTD) with -$253M in YTD flows. NZAC performs worse with 8.91% YTD performance, and -$457K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XT and NZAC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XT vs NZAC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XT NZAC | -3.17%-1.77% | +3.28%+4.27% | +16.04%+8.91% | +26.00%+14.29% | +60.60%+65.22% | +37.25%+55.41% |
| Flows | XT NZAC | +$4M- | -$12M- | -$253M-$457K | -$279M-$5M | -$777M-$129M | -$901M+$9M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XT NZAC | +18.18%+11.67% | +17.80%+12.23% | +18.85%+12.68% | +21.05%+14.31% |
| Max drawdown | XT NZAC | -7.23%-3.51% | -10.42%-9.86% | -21.93%-15.87% | -34.33%-27.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | XT NZAC | 37d49d | 77d76d | 112d86d | 1323d763d |
Trading data
XT | NZAC | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 2:46 PM | $81.11 | $46.19 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $80.51 | $46.67 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XT | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 2:46 PM
Live
Closed
XT | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.11 | $46.19 |
| 1D performance | +0.74% | -1.03% |
| AuM | $3.87 B | $194.76 M |
| E/R | 0.46% | 0.12% |
Characteristics
XT | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index | MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned PAB with Dev Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 195 | 614 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2015 | November 25, 2014 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Exposure
Countries
XT
USA
68.43%
Other
31.57%
NZAC
USA
62.82%
Other
37.18%
Sectors
XT
Technology
46.32%
Healthcare
28.6%
Industrials
9.31%
Other
15.76%
NZAC
Technology
39.7%
Finance
24.45%
Industrials
9.01%
Healthcare
8.96%
Other
17.9%
Diversification
XT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.37%
NZAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.35%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
XT
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.12%
Microsoft Corp.
3.96%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
3.93%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.83%
Johnson & Johnson
3.43%
Tesla, Inc.
3.10%
Analog Devices, Inc.
3.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.76%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.71%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.20%
Broadcom Inc.
2.20%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
1.95%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.84%
Roche Holding AG
1.80%
NZAC
NVIDIA Corp.
5.75%
Apple, Inc.
4.98%
Microsoft Corp.
3.67%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.69%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.42%
Broadcom Inc.
1.91%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.88%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.58%
Tesla, Inc.
1.32%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.32%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.26%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.18%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.15%
Equinix, Inc.
0.97%
Frequently asked questions about XT and NZAC
How have the XT and NZAC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, XT is up 16.04% year-to-date (YTD), while NZAC has returned 8.91%. That puts XT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XT or NZAC?
Year-to-date, the XT ETF saw -$253M in flows, compared to -$457K for NZAC.
Which ETF is more volatile: XT or NZAC?
Over the past year, XT had a volatility of 17.8%, while NZAC experienced 12.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: XT or NZAC?
As of September 10, 2026, XT holds $3.87 B in assets under management (AUM), while NZAC manages $194.76 M.
What sectors do the XT and NZAC ETFs invest in?
XT leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, NZAC focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the XT ETF and NZAC ETF?
XT top holdings include Eli Lilly & Co., Microsoft Corp. and Texas Instruments Incorporated. NZAC holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XT or NZAC?
XT holds 195 securities with 43.37% of its assets in the top 15. NZAC has 621 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.35%.
Advertisement
Latest news about XT & NZAC
Advertisement
Advertisement
