XSEPvsGPIXETF Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. XSEP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.35% for GPIX. XSEP is up 7.23% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. GPIX performs better with 13.06% YTD performance, and +$3.36B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XSEP and GPIX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XSEP vs GPIX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XSEP GPIX | +0.51%+1.72% | +1.85%+2.41% | +7.23%+13.06% | +9.79%+17.41% | +32.26%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | XSEP GPIX | -$39M+$469M | -$39M+$1.40B | -$13M+$3.36B | -$16M+$4.11B | -$51M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XSEP GPIX | +2.59%+9.12% | +4.59%+11.06% | +6.41%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | XSEP GPIX | -0.55%-2.24% | -3.62%-7.71% | -9.07%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XSEP GPIX | 3d15d | 42d47d | 84dn/a | n/an/a |
XSEP | GPIX | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.46 | $55.82 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $45.35 | $55.60 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
XSEP | GPIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.46 | $55.82 |
| 1D performance | +0.25% | +0.40% |
| AuM | $98.77 M | $6.22 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.35% |
XSEP | GPIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 21, 2022 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
