XMARvsJEPQETF Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. XMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.35% for JEPQ. XMAR is up 9.57% year-to-date (YTD) with -$25M in YTD flows. JEPQ performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$10.33B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XMAR and JEPQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XMAR vs JEPQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMAR JEPQ | +0.86%+0.51% | +2.01%+2.60% | +9.57%+10.72% | +11.56%+15.71% | +37.06%+71.07% | n/an/a |
| Flows | XMAR JEPQ | +$4M+$1.45B | +$58K+$3.86B | -$25M+$10.33B | -$30M+$11.72B | -$156M+$33.68B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XMAR JEPQ | +2.18%+13.96% | +3.17%+14.95% | +5.97%+15.77% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | XMAR JEPQ | -0.49%-5.97% | -1.71%-8.85% | -7.19%-20.17% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XMAR JEPQ | 15d13d | 6d76d | 45d169d | n/an/a |
XMAR | JEPQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.67 | $58.81 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $43.74 | $60.10 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
XMAR | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.67 | $58.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.15% | -2.15% |
| AuM | $159.81 M | $43.34 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.35% |
XMAR | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 17, 2023 | May 3, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |