XESvsPXJETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF - USD (PXJ) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. XES's top 2 sector exposures are Energy and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, PXJ's top sector exposures are Energy. XES is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.67% for PXJ. XES is up 36.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. PXJ performs better with 61.02% YTD performance, and +$89M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XES and PXJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XES vs PXJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XES PXJ | -0.04%+4.57% | +0.98%+11.08% | +36.63%+61.02% | +42.68%+64.24% | +31.21%+70.43% | +89.96%+165.30% |
| Flows | XES PXJ | -$17M+$1M | -$26M+$68M | +$1M+$89M | +$39M+$88M | -$137M+$38M | +$67M+$93M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XES PXJ | +33.06%+27.25% | +30.76%+26.18% | +33.65%+28.99% | +38.07%+33.47% |
| Max drawdown | XES PXJ | -16.97%-8.83% | -21.68%-18.25% | -45.60%-39.90% | -45.92%-39.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | XES PXJ | 70d54d | 161d88d | 539d525d | 864d525d |
Trading data
XES | PXJ | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $112.71 | $46.22 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $111.12 | $46.24 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XES | PXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XES | PXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $112.71 | $46.22 |
| 1D performance | +1.43% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $345.68 M | $134.23 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.67% |
Characteristics
XES | PXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index | Dynamic Oil Services Intellidex Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 30 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 19, 2006 | October 26, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XES
USA
83.07%
Bermuda
10.37%
Other
6.57%
PXJ
USA
65.67%
Bermuda
13.13%
Other
21.21%
Sectors
XES
Energy
95.68%
Other
4.32%
PXJ
Energy
100%
Advertisement
Diversification
XES
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.67%
PXJ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.5%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
XES
Oceaneering International, Inc.
4.84%
Tidewater, Inc.
4.66%
Cactus, Inc.
4.45%
TechnipFMC plc
4.11%
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
4.07%
Seadrill Ltd.
4.00%
SLB Ltd.
3.98%
Select Water Solutions, Inc.
3.89%
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
3.83%
NOV, Inc.
3.71%
Baker Hughes Co.
3.71%
Weatherford International plc
3.67%
Noble Corp. Plc
3.64%
Valaris Ltd.
3.57%
Transocean Ltd.
3.55%
PXJ
Frontline Plc
5.84%
TechnipFMC plc
5.22%
NOV, Inc.
4.82%
Noble Corp. Plc
4.56%
Baker Hughes Co.
4.54%
Transocean Ltd.
4.32%
Halliburton Co.
4.22%
Weatherford International plc
4.12%
National Energy Services Reunited Corp.
3.60%
Oceaneering International, Inc.
3.49%
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
3.30%
International Seaways, Inc.
3.19%
Tidewater, Inc.
3.15%
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
3.11%
Expro Ltd.
3.03%
Frequently asked questions about XES and PXJ
How have the XES and PXJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, XES is up 36.63% year-to-date (YTD), while PXJ has returned 61.02%. That puts PXJ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XES or PXJ?
Year-to-date, the XES ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to +$89M for PXJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: XES or PXJ?
Over the past year, XES had a volatility of 30.76%, while PXJ experienced 26.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: XES or PXJ?
As of October 26, 2026, XES holds $345.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while PXJ manages $134.23 M.
What sectors do the XES and PXJ ETFs invest in?
XES leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, PXJ focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the XES ETF and PXJ ETF?
XES top holdings include Oceaneering International, Inc., Tidewater, Inc. and Cactus, Inc.. PXJ holds in its top three: Frontline Plc, TechnipFMC plc and NOV, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XES or PXJ?
XES holds 33 securities with 59.67% of its assets in the top 15. PXJ has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.5%.
Advertisement
Latest news about XES & PXJ
Energy Sector Plummets on Fed Comments and Crude Oil Stocks
May 27, 2024
XES
Oil Prices Fall After a Surprise Jump in U.S. Crude Stockpiles
January 16, 2024
XES
Energy Sector Weighed Down by Oil Prices Amid Sluggish World Data
August 29, 2023
XES
Implications of OPEC+ cutting its oil output
October 17, 2022
PXJ
Advertisement
Advertisement
