Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
WUGIvsIWFETF Comparison
AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) belongs to the 5G segment. iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. WUGI's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IWF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. WUGI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.37%, versus 0.18% for IWF. WUGI is down -3.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. IWF performs worse with -6.31% YTD performance, and -$3.44B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of WUGI and IWF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
WUGI vs IWF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | WUGI IWF | -2.76%-1.24% | -5.21%-5.86% | -3.14%-6.31% | +26.75%+20.94% | +154.85%+99.98% | +70.82%+89.68% |
| Flows | WUGI IWF | -$2M+$604M | -$1M-$2.36B | +$8M-$3.44B | -$7M-$1.54B | -$7M-$514M | -$30M-$1.29B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | WUGI IWF | +24.82%+15.86% | +26.88%+22.65% | +26.19%+19.06% | +29.86%+21.42% |
| Max drawdown | WUGI IWF | -10.03%-7.72% | -18.63%-15.75% | -27.01%-23.36% | -56.30%-32.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | WUGI IWF | 58d77d | 45d45d | 126d191d | 939d743d |
WUGI | IWF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.42 | $438.29 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $68.39 | $443.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
WUGI | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
WUGI | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.42 | $438.29 |
| 1D performance | -1.41% | -1.13% |
| AuM | $28.10 M | $114.85 B |
| E/R | 1.37% | 0.18% |
WUGI | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AXS Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 349 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 31, 2020 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the WUGI and IWF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, WUGI is down -3.14% year-to-date (YTD), while IWF has lost -6.31%. That puts WUGI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: WUGI or IWF?
Year-to-date, the WUGI ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to -$3.44B for IWF.
Which ETF is more volatile: WUGI or IWF?
Over the past year, WUGI had a volatility of 26.88%, while IWF experienced 22.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: WUGI or IWF?
As of March 11, 2026, WUGI holds $28.10 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWF manages $114.85 B.
What sectors do the WUGI and IWF ETFs invest in?
WUGI leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Communication Services. Meanwhile, IWF focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the WUGI ETF and IWF ETF?
WUGI top holdings include NVIDIA, US8740391003 and SYNOPSYS. IWF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: WUGI or IWF?
WUGI holds 27 securities with 78.72% of its assets in the top 15. IWF has 391 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.22%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
