Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
WTVvsULVMETF Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. WTV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, ULVM's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. WTV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.25% for ULVM. WTV is up 2.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$497M in YTD flows. ULVM performs better with 6.02% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of WTV and ULVM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
WTV vs ULVM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | WTV ULVM | -4.87%-2.64% | +1.54%+4.87% | +2.68%+6.02% | +19.88%+24.69% | +78.19%+68.24% | +86.65%+74.96% |
| Flows | WTV ULVM | +$277M+$5M | +$545M+$19M | +$497M+$19M | +$1.69B+$54M | +$2.23B-$69M | +$2.31B-$413M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | WTV ULVM | +11.48%+11.05% | +18.00%+16.97% | +15.62%+14.03% | +17.21%+15.71% |
| Max drawdown | WTV ULVM | -4.89%-3.52% | -13.56%-13.34% | -18.48%-18.21% | -19.31%-19.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | WTV ULVM | 29d13d | 46d46d | 233d232d | 392d717d |
WTV | ULVM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $95.71 | $96.52 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $96.10 | $96.52 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
WTV | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
WTV | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $95.71 | $96.52 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $2.69 B | $236.47 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.25% |
WTV | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | WisdomTree | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index |
| N° of holdings | 119 | 118 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 23, 2007 | October 24, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the WTV and ULVM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, WTV is up 2.68% year-to-date (YTD), while ULVM has returned 6.02%. That puts ULVM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: WTV or ULVM?
Year-to-date, the WTV ETF saw +$497M in flows, compared to +$19M for ULVM.
Which ETF is more volatile: WTV or ULVM?
Over the past year, WTV had a volatility of 18%, while ULVM experienced 16.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: WTV or ULVM?
As of March 11, 2026, WTV holds $2.69 B in assets under management (AUM), while ULVM manages $236.47 M.
What sectors do the WTV and ULVM ETFs invest in?
WTV leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ULVM focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the WTV ETF and ULVM ETF?
WTV top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, META PLATFORMS and WALMART INC. ULVM holds in its top three: CENTERPOINT ENERGY, REALTY INCOME REIT and AMEREN.
Which ETF is more diversified: WTV or ULVM?
WTV holds 120 securities with 23.97% of its assets in the top 15. ULVM has 121 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.39%.
The Cheapest Active ETFs of 2025
Finetuning Value and Growth ETF Allocations Beyond the Russell 1000 Index
Two Ways to Invest in Quality with WisdomTree ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
