Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
WTVvsBMVPETF Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. WTV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, BMVP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. WTV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.29% for BMVP. WTV is up 1.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$288M in YTD flows. BMVP performs better with 4.19% YTD performance, and -$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of WTV and BMVP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
WTV vs BMVP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | WTV BMVP | -4.69%-1.84% | +0.62%+3.10% | +1.48%+4.19% | +19.01%+10.53% | +76.11%+51.59% | +82.90%+39.21% |
| Flows | WTV BMVP | -$22M- | +$330M-$1M | +$288M-$1M | +$1.48B-$16M | +$2.02B-$22M | +$2.11B-$50M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | WTV BMVP | +11.72%+10.59% | +18.04%+14.36% | +15.63%+12.52% | +17.22%+16.47% |
| Max drawdown | WTV BMVP | -6.01%-3.96% | -13.56%-11.10% | -18.48%-15.00% | -19.31%-26.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | WTV BMVP | 30d32d | 46d43d | 233d374d | 392d799d |
WTV | BMVP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $94.54 | $50.86 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $94.66 | $51.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
WTV | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
WTV | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $94.54 | $50.86 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | -0.66% |
| AuM | $2.45 B | $101.68 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.29% |
WTV | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | WisdomTree | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg MVP Index |
| N° of holdings | 119 | 56 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 23, 2007 | May 1, 2003 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the WTV and BMVP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, WTV is up 1.48% year-to-date (YTD), while BMVP has returned 4.19%. That puts BMVP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: WTV or BMVP?
Year-to-date, the WTV ETF saw +$288M in flows, compared to -$1M for BMVP.
Which ETF is more volatile: WTV or BMVP?
Over the past year, WTV had a volatility of 18.04%, while BMVP experienced 14.36%.
Which ETF is bigger: WTV or BMVP?
As of March 12, 2026, WTV holds $2.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while BMVP manages $101.68 M.
What sectors do the WTV and BMVP ETFs invest in?
WTV leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BMVP focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the WTV ETF and BMVP ETF?
WTV top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, META PLATFORMS and WALMART INC. BMVP holds in its top three: HALLIBURTON, LOCKHEED MARTIN and HOME DEPOT.
Which ETF is more diversified: WTV or BMVP?
WTV holds 120 securities with 23.97% of its assets in the top 15. BMVP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.68%.
The Cheapest Active ETFs of 2025
Finetuning Value and Growth ETF Allocations Beyond the Russell 1000 Index
Two Ways to Invest in Quality with WisdomTree ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
