WOODvsCGWETF Comparison
VS
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. WOOD's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Finance and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. WOOD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.59% for CGW. WOOD is down -0.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$42M in YTD flows. CGW performs better with 1.08% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of WOOD and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
WOOD vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | WOOD CGW | -3.13%-3.55% | +8.38%+2.99% | -0.91%+1.08% | -3.42%+2.20% | +1.72%+36.47% | -12.96%+16.34% |
| Flows | WOOD CGW | +$4M- | +$4M+$15M | +$42M+$41M | +$38M+$26M | +$73M-$148M | +$19M-$185M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | WOOD CGW | +16.59%+12.99% | +17.96%+13.05% | +17.13%+13.79% | +18.89%+15.77% |
| Max drawdown | WOOD CGW | -4.29%-4.72% | -21.84%-10.52% | -23.24%-14.42% | -30.74%-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | WOOD CGW | 32d36d | 210d196d | 710d227d | 1701d862d |
Trading data
WOOD | CGW | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $70.76 | $63.49 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $70.50 | $63.45 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
WOOD | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
WOOD | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $70.76 | $63.49 |
| 1D performance | +0.36% | +0.06% |
| AuM | $267.35 M | $1.03 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.59% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
WOOD
USA
20.14%
Brazil
13.14%
Japan
12.36%
Sweden
10.54%
Finland
9.91%
Other
33.91%
CGW
USA
57.49%
United Kingdom
14.01%
Brazil
10.44%
Other
18.06%
Sectors
WOOD
Non-Energy Materi.
84.57%
Finance
11.11%
Other
4.32%
CGW
Utilities
45.55%
Industrials
35.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.23%
Other
3.27%
Advertisement
Diversification
WOOD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.64%
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
68.16%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
WOOD
Suzano SA
7.53%
Weyerhaeuser Co.
7.27%
Mondi Plc
6.96%
Smurfit WestRock Plc
6.07%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj
5.52%
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings Ltd.
5.30%
International Paper Co.
4.96%
Oji Holdings Corp.
4.75%
Klabin SA
4.52%
Svenska Cellulosa AB SCA
4.49%
Stora Enso Oyj
4.39%
Holmen AB
4.06%
Sylvamo Corp.
3.97%
Sumitomo Forestry Co., Ltd.
3.93%
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
3.91%
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.35%
Xylem, Inc.
8.21%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.29%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.88%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.49%
Severn Trent Plc
4.99%
Veralto Corp.
4.83%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.13%
Geberit AG
3.43%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.36%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.13%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.60%
American States Water Co.
2.34%
California Water Service Group
2.10%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.03%
Frequently asked questions about WOOD and CGW
How have the WOOD and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, WOOD is down -0.91% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 1.08%. That puts CGW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: WOOD or CGW?
Year-to-date, the WOOD ETF saw +$42M in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: WOOD or CGW?
Over the past year, WOOD had a volatility of 17.96%, while CGW experienced 13.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: WOOD or CGW?
As of September 10, 2026, WOOD holds $267.35 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.03 B.
What sectors do the WOOD and CGW ETFs invest in?
WOOD leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials and Finance. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the WOOD ETF and CGW ETF?
WOOD top holdings include Suzano SA, Weyerhaeuser Co. and Mondi Plc. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.
Which ETF is more diversified: WOOD or CGW?
WOOD holds 26 securities with 77.64% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 66 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.16%.
Advertisement
Latest news about WOOD & CGW
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
CGW
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
