Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
VCRvsFDISETF Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Discretionary. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Materials. VCR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.08% for FDIS. VCR is down -4.9% year-to-date (YTD) with -$129M in YTD flows. FDIS performs better with -4.58% YTD performance, and -$176M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VCR and FDIS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
VCR vs FDIS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VCR FDIS | -3.89%-4.13% | -5.80%-5.09% | -4.90%-4.58% | +16.24%+15.90% | +63.68%+64.15% | +32.59%+35.33% |
| Flows | VCR FDIS | -$36M-$15M | -$117M-$150M | -$129M-$176M | -$599M-$315M | -$300M+$81M | -$558M-$62M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VCR FDIS | +15.73%+15.73% | +24.30%+24.29% | +20.70%+20.79% | +24.03%+23.81% |
| Max drawdown | VCR FDIS | -9.29%-8.99% | -15.03%-15.02% | -27.43%-27.35% | -39.16%-39.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | VCR FDIS | 59d58d | 45d45d | 272d269d | 1094d1094d |
VCR | FDIS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $365.93 | $95.09 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $374.41 | $97.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
VCR | FDIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
VCR | FDIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $365.93 | $95.09 |
| 1D performance | -2.26% | -2.26% |
| AuM | $5.89 B | $1.72 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.08% |
VCR | FDIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Vanguard | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | MSCI US IMI Consumer Discionary 25-50 Index | MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index |
| N° of holdings | 273 | 233 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 26, 2004 | October 21, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the VCR and FDIS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, VCR is down -4.9% year-to-date (YTD), while FDIS has lost -4.58%. That puts FDIS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VCR or FDIS?
Year-to-date, the VCR ETF saw -$129M in flows, compared to -$176M for FDIS.
Which ETF is more volatile: VCR or FDIS?
Over the past year, VCR had a volatility of 24.3%, while FDIS experienced 24.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: VCR or FDIS?
As of March 11, 2026, VCR holds $5.89 B in assets under management (AUM), while FDIS manages $1.72 B.
What sectors do the VCR and FDIS ETFs invest in?
VCR leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FDIS focuses on Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the VCR ETF and FDIS ETF?
VCR top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, TESLA and HOME DEPOT. FDIS holds in its top three: AMAZON.COM INC, TESLA and HOME DEPOT.
Which ETF is more diversified: VCR or FDIS?
VCR holds 285 securities with 65.2% of its assets in the top 15. FDIS has 244 securities and a top 15 weight of 64.29%.
Consumer Discretionary Sector Hit by Tesla Stock's Plummet
Consumer Discretionary Funds Weighed Down by Tesla Stocks
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Sector ETFs (Vanguard versus State Street SPDR)
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.