Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
USNGvsMLPAETF Comparison
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. USNG's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, MLPA's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities USNG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.45% for MLPA. USNG is up 20.57% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. MLPA performs worse with 13.52% YTD performance, and +$73M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USNG and MLPA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
USNG vs MLPA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USNG MLPA | +4.65%+3.39% | +17.62%+12.66% | +20.57%+13.52% | n/a+12.43% | n/a+62.55% | n/a+130.24% |
| Flows | USNG MLPA | -+$16M | -+$115M | -+$73M | -+$244M | -+$374M | -+$682M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USNG MLPA | +16.88%+10.97% | n/a+15.79% | n/a+13.85% | n/a+18.44% |
| Max drawdown | USNG MLPA | -4.81%-1.74% | n/a-14.09% | n/a-14.09% | n/a-18.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | USNG MLPA | 28d5d | n/a299d | n/a299d | n/a77d |
USNG | MLPA | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:46 PM | $33.08 | $53.80 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $33.08 | $53.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
USNG | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
USNG | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.08 | $53.80 |
| 1D performance | -0.00% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $5.63 M | $2.14 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.45% |
USNG | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 20 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 20, 2025 | April 18, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the USNG and MLPA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, USNG is up 20.57% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPA has returned 13.52%. That puts USNG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USNG or MLPA?
Year-to-date, the USNG ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$73M for MLPA.
Which ETF is bigger: USNG or MLPA?
As of March 11, 2026, USNG holds $5.63 M in assets under management (AUM), while MLPA manages $2.14 B.
What sectors do the USNG and MLPA ETFs invest in?
USNG leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, MLPA focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the USNG ETF and MLPA ETF?
USNG top holdings include SOLARIS OILFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE, WILLIAMS and KINDER MORGAN. MLPA holds in its top three: ENERGY TRANSFER LP UNITS, ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS UNT and MPLX COMMON UNITS.
Which ETF is more diversified: USNG or MLPA?
USNG holds 26 securities with 80.48% of its assets in the top 15. MLPA has 20 securities and a top 15 weight of 107.18%.
Three Ways You Can Get Higher Income with ETFs
Resilience in Energy Infrastructure Funds Amidst Last Week’s Market Decline
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
