USNGvsIGFETF Comparison
ETF 1
USNG
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
This fund is part of
Infrastructure
-0.12%
VS
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. USNG's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, IGF's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. USNG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.39% for IGF. USNG is up 28.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. IGF performs worse with 10.3% YTD performance, and +$1.16B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USNG and IGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
USNG vs IGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USNG IGF | -2.14%+1.21% | +4.12%+0.56% | +28.90%+10.30% | +39.53%+17.53% | n/a+56.24% | n/a+73.14% |
| Flows | USNG IGF | -$733K-$34M | +$384K+$616M | +$1M+$1.16B | +$2M+$2.24B | -+$4.88B | -+$5.55B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USNG IGF | +19.51%+12.29% | +16.90%+10.08% | n/a+11.98% | n/a+13.31% |
| Max drawdown | USNG IGF | -6.56%-4.06% | -6.86%-5.86% | n/a-14.01% | n/a-20.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | USNG IGF | 53d56d | 41d138d | n/a149d | n/a747d |
Trading data
USNG | IGF | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.14 | $66.94 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $35.17 | $66.87 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
USNG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUSNG | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
USNG | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.14 | $66.94 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | +0.10% |
| AuM | $7.03 M | $10.88 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
USNG | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 76 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 20, 2025 | December 10, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
USNG
USA
83.39%
Canada
10.97%
Other
5.64%
IGF
USA
35.97%
Australia
9.96%
Spain
8.72%
Canada
8.26%
Other
37.08%
Sectors
USNG
Energy
78.47%
Industrials
13.57%
Other
7.96%
IGF
Industrials
40.62%
Utilities
39.47%
Energy
19.23%
Other
0.68%
Advertisement
Diversification
USNG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
80.83%
IGF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.29%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
USNG
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
10.31%
Bloom Energy Corp.
9.19%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
8.23%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
7.07%
Enbridge, Inc.
6.82%
MPLX LP
6.54%
TC Energy Corp.
4.15%
DT Midstream, Inc.
4.02%
Plains GP Holdings LP
4.00%
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
3.76%
Archrock, Inc.
3.64%
Targa Resources Corp.
3.55%
Energy Transfer LP
3.51%
Western Midstream Partners LP
3.08%
Vistra Corp.
2.96%
IGF
Transurban Group Ltd.
5.48%
Aena S.M.E. SA
4.90%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
4.78%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.05%
Iberdrola SA
3.82%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico SAB de CV
3.66%
Auckland International Airport Ltd.
3.19%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
2.95%
The Southern Co.
2.74%
Getlink SE
2.60%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.58%
Qube Holdings Ltd.
2.42%
Constellation Energy Corp.
2.42%
TC Energy Corp.
2.35%
Enel SpA
2.34%
Frequently asked questions about USNG and IGF
How have the USNG and IGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, USNG is up 28.9% year-to-date (YTD), while IGF has returned 10.3%. That puts USNG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USNG or IGF?
Year-to-date, the USNG ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to +$1.16B for IGF.
Which ETF is more volatile: USNG or IGF?
Over the past year, USNG had a volatility of 16.9%, while IGF experienced 10.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: USNG or IGF?
As of July 17, 2026, USNG holds $7.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while IGF manages $10.88 B.
What sectors do the USNG and IGF ETFs invest in?
USNG leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, IGF focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the USNG ETF and IGF ETF?
USNG top holdings include Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc., Bloom Energy Corp. and The Williams Cos., Inc.. IGF holds in its top three: Transurban Group Ltd., Aena S.M.E. SA and NextEra Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: USNG or IGF?
USNG holds 26 securities with 80.83% of its assets in the top 15. IGF has 77 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.29%.
Advertisement
Latest news about USNG & IGF
Advertisement
