USEvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.73%
USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. USE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. USE is up 67.82% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. QDPL performs worse with 12.06% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USE and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
USE vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USE QDPL | +4.08%+1.34% | +28.60%+1.65% | +67.82%+12.06% | +43.98%+15.84% | +53.56%+73.85% | n/a+75.18% |
| Flows | USE QDPL | -$4M+$35M | -$1M+$119M | -$1M+$300M | -$1M+$420M | -$1M+$1.37B | -+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USE QDPL | +33.08%+10.24% | +36.90%+11.68% | +29.62%+13.54% | n/a+15.34% |
| Max drawdown | USE QDPL | -12.64%-2.82% | -27.97%-8.32% | -27.97%-17.47% | n/a-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | USE QDPL | 40d53d | 113d70d | 113d126d | n/a704d |
Trading data
USE | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.42 | $45.95 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $37.76 | $46.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
USE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUSE | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
USE | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.42 | $45.95 |
| 1D performance | +1.75% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $2.88 M | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
USE | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | USCF | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 4, 2023 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
USE
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
USE
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
USE
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
USE
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about USE and QDPL
How have the USE and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, USE is up 67.82% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.06%. That puts USE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USE or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the USE ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: USE or QDPL?
Over the past year, USE had a volatility of 36.9%, while QDPL experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: USE or QDPL?
As of October 16, 2026, USE holds $2.88 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about USE & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
