Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
USAIvsMLPDETF Comparison
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF - Distributing
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF - Distributing (USAI) belongs to the Infrastructure segment. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. USAI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.6% for MLPD. USAI is up 20.33% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. MLPD performs worse with 4.63% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USAI and MLPD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
USAI vs MLPD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USAI MLPD | +6.09%+0.97% | +20.85%+6.10% | +20.33%+4.63% | +23.98%+20.71% | +102.15%n/a | +166.85%n/a |
| Flows | USAI MLPD | -+$4M | -$2M+$7M | -$2M+$6M | -$8M+$10M | +$13M- | +$42M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USAI MLPD | +15.62%+10.22% | +19.92%+14.66% | +17.49%n/a | +20.47%n/a |
| Max drawdown | USAI MLPD | -3.40%-1.68% | -16.04%-12.85% | -18.00%n/a | -20.75%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | USAI MLPD | 9d8d | 308d61d | 372dn/a | 533dn/a |
USAI | MLPD | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.10 | $25.73 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $45.58 | $25.67 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
USAI | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
USAI | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.10 | $25.73 |
| 1D performance | +1.14% | +0.22% |
| AuM | $95.70 M | $20.18 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.6% |
USAI | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Global X |
| Benchmark | American Energy Independence Index | Cboe MLPX ATM BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 10, 2017 | May 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the USAI and MLPD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, USAI is up 20.33% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPD has returned 4.63%. That puts USAI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USAI or MLPD?
Year-to-date, the USAI ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$6M for MLPD.
Which ETF is more volatile: USAI or MLPD?
Over the past year, USAI had a volatility of 19.92%, while MLPD experienced 14.66%.
Which ETF is bigger: USAI or MLPD?
As of March 10, 2026, USAI holds $95.70 M in assets under management (AUM), while MLPD manages $20.18 M.
What sectors do the USAI and MLPD ETFs invest in?
USAI leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, MLPD focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the USAI ETF and MLPD ETF?
USAI top holdings include WILLIAMS, KINDER MORGAN and ENERGY TRANSFER LP UNITS. MLPD holds in its top three: WILLIAMS, TC ENERGY CORP and ENBRIDGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: USAI or MLPD?
USAI holds 26 securities with 76.23% of its assets in the top 15. MLPD has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 90.42%.
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
