URAvsSETMETF Comparison
VS
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, SETM's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. URA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.65% for SETM. URA is down -6.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$835M in YTD flows. SETM performs better with 2.63% YTD performance, and +$333M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and SETM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
URA vs SETM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA SETM | -10.92%-8.44% | -27.83%-19.85% | -6.62%+2.63% | -0.34%+47.85% | +109.75%+76.28% | +149.57%n/a |
| Flows | URA SETM | +$36M-$20M | -$23M+$65M | +$835M+$333M | +$1.86B+$485M | +$2.82B+$530M | +$3.90B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA SETM | +44.40%+40.37% | +44.75%+38.42% | +36.36%+31.40% | +37.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown | URA SETM | -33.01%-27.19% | -36.85%-28.06% | -36.85%-41.59% | -37.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | URA SETM | 79d73d | 177d176d | 177d427d | 738dn/a |
Trading data
URA | SETM | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.89 | $28.88 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $41.13 | $29.42 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
URA | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URA | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.89 | $28.88 |
| 1D performance | -3.01% | -1.84% |
| AuM | $5.55 B | $527.95 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
URA | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Uranium Index | Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 154 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 4, 2010 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
URA
Canada
42.07%
USA
21.88%
Republic of Korea
13.99%
Australia
9.1%
Other
12.96%
SETM
Canada
31.17%
USA
23.26%
Australia
21.86%
Other
23.71%
Sectors
URA
Energy
54.35%
Industrials
24.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
13.93%
SETM
Non-Energy Materi.
74.01%
Energy
24.12%
Other
1.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
SETM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.42%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
URA
Cameco Corp.
24.63%
Oklo, Inc.
6.72%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.14%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.32%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.81%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.73%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.75%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.06%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.98%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.95%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.87%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
2.79%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.65%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.24%
SETM
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
5.37%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
5.33%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
5.08%
Cameco Corp.
5.07%
PLS Group Ltd.
4.20%
Albemarle Corp.
3.69%
MP Materials Corp.
3.42%
Uranium Energy Corp.
3.33%
Teck Resources Limited
3.26%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
3.15%
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura SAA
2.93%
Antofagasta Plc
2.78%
First Majestic Silver Corp.
2.69%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
2.56%
Hecla Mining Co.
2.54%
Frequently asked questions about URA and SETM
How have the URA and SETM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, URA is down -6.62% year-to-date (YTD), while SETM has returned 2.63%. That puts SETM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or SETM?
Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$835M in flows, compared to +$333M for SETM.
Which ETF is more volatile: URA or SETM?
Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 44.75%, while SETM experienced 38.42%.
Which ETF is bigger: URA or SETM?
As of July 24, 2026, URA holds $5.55 B in assets under management (AUM), while SETM manages $527.95 M.
What sectors do the URA and SETM ETFs invest in?
URA leans toward sectors like Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, SETM focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the URA ETF and SETM ETF?
URA top holdings include Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd.. SETM holds in its top three: Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: URA or SETM?
URA holds 49 securities with 79.24% of its assets in the top 15. SETM has 156 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.42%.
Advertisement
Latest news about URA & SETM
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
SETM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
SETM
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
URA
Advertisement
