URAvsQCLNETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-1.64%
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, QCLN's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. URA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.56% for QCLN. URA is up 4.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$842M in YTD flows. QCLN performs better with 38.02% YTD performance, and +$105M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and QCLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
URA vs QCLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA QCLN | -21.64%+2.94% | -10.93%+31.57% | +4.25%+38.02% | +33.37%+92.08% | +134.11%+24.09% | +135.61%-2.19% |
| Flows | URA QCLN | -$82M+$61M | -$24M+$113M | +$842M+$105M | +$1.91B+$88M | +$2.85B-$569M | +$3.87B-$945M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA QCLN | +44.78%+44.29% | +44.02%+36.09% | +35.71%+35.98% | +37.22%+38.52% |
| Max drawdown | URA QCLN | -22.30%-10.38% | -28.67%-15.86% | -36.76%-56.02% | -37.14%-69.47% |
| Max drawdown duration | URA QCLN | 34d6d | 97d75d | 214d1008d | 738d1673d |
Trading data
URA | QCLN | |
Last sale 6/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.35 | $57.24 |
| Previous close 06/09/2026 | $44.12 | $60.14 |
| Consolidated volume 06/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
URA | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URA | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.35 | $57.24 |
| 1D performance | -4.01% | -4.82% |
| AuM | $6.20 B | $839.85 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
URA | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Uranium Index | NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 4, 2010 | February 8, 2007 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
URA
Canada
43.97%
USA
22.13%
Republic of Korea
16.43%
Australia
9.21%
Other
8.25%
QCLN
USA
88.75%
Other
11.25%
Sectors
URA
Energy
51.28%
Industrials
25.36%
Other
23.36%
QCLN
Information Techn.
37.32%
Industrials
25.76%
Consumer Discreti.
11.1%
Materials
8.1%
Utilities
7.52%
Other
10.19%
Diversification
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.87%
QCLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.63%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
URA
CAMECO
22.37%
ALTC ACQUISITION
6.80%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.11%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.42%
US63253R2013
4.77%
DAEWOO ENG&CONST
4.46%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
4.37%
ENERGY FUELS
4.00%
PALADIN ENERGY
3.34%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
3.30%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP
2.83%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY
2.82%
DENISON MINES
2.82%
BHP GROUP LTD
2.33%
KEPCO E&C
2.12%
QCLN
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
10.18%
ON SEMICONDUCTOR
9.83%
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS
9.22%
TESLA
6.54%
FIRST SOLAR
5.95%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
3.85%
RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE
3.69%
ALBEMARLE
3.66%
MP MATERIALS CORPORATION
3.59%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
3.33%
ACUITY BRANDS
2.86%
VICOR
2.68%
ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS
2.50%
ENERSYS
2.49%
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES
2.25%
Frequently asked questions about URA and QCLN
How have the URA and QCLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 9, 2026, URA is up 4.25% year-to-date (YTD), while QCLN has returned 38.02%. That puts QCLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or QCLN?
Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$842M in flows, compared to +$105M for QCLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: URA or QCLN?
Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 44.02%, while QCLN experienced 36.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: URA or QCLN?
As of June 9, 2026, URA holds $6.20 B in assets under management (AUM), while QCLN manages $839.85 M.
What sectors do the URA and QCLN ETFs invest in?
URA leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, QCLN focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the URA ETF and QCLN ETF?
URA top holdings include CAMECO, ALTC ACQUISITION and NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. QCLN holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, ON SEMICONDUCTOR and MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: URA or QCLN?
URA holds 49 securities with 77.87% of its assets in the top 15. QCLN has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.63%.
Advertisement
Latest news about URA & QCLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
QCLN
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
URA
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
Advertisement
