URAvsNUKZETF Comparison
VS
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, NUKZ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. URA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.85% for NUKZ. URA is down -6.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$835M in YTD flows. NUKZ performs better with 3.02% YTD performance, and +$46M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and NUKZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
URA vs NUKZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA NUKZ | -10.92%-5.80% | -27.83%-11.42% | -6.62%+3.02% | -0.34%+10.54% | +109.75%n/a | +149.57%n/a |
| Flows | URA NUKZ | +$36M-$16M | -$23M+$17M | +$835M+$46M | +$1.86B+$305M | +$2.82B- | +$3.90B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA NUKZ | +44.40%+29.64% | +44.75%+27.43% | +36.36%n/a | +37.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown | URA NUKZ | -33.01%-17.47% | -36.85%-17.47% | -36.85%n/a | -37.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | URA NUKZ | 79d78d | 177d78d | 177dn/a | 738dn/a |
Trading data
URA | NUKZ | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.32 | $64.35 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $39.89 | $64.22 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
URA | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URA | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.32 | $64.35 |
| 1D performance | +1.08% | +0.21% |
| AuM | $5.55 B | $787.48 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
URA | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Uranium Index | VettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 4, 2010 | January 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
URA
Canada
42.07%
USA
21.88%
Republic of Korea
13.99%
Australia
9.1%
Other
12.96%
NUKZ
USA
54.74%
Canada
10.93%
Republic of Korea
9.99%
Other
24.34%
Sectors
URA
Energy
54.35%
Industrials
24.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
13.93%
NUKZ
Industrials
50.66%
Utilities
31.59%
Energy
9.91%
Other
7.85%
Advertisement
Diversification
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
NUKZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
URA
Cameco Corp.
24.63%
Oklo, Inc.
6.72%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.14%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.32%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.81%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.73%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.75%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.06%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.98%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.95%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.87%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
2.79%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.65%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.24%
NUKZ
Cameco Corp.
8.71%
GE Vernova, Inc.
4.29%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.85%
Talen Energy Corp.
3.44%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
3.40%
Endesa SA
3.31%
Dominion Energy, Inc.
3.16%
CEZ as
3.06%
Solstice Advanced Materials, Inc.
3.02%
Vistra Corp.
2.89%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.79%
Fortum Oyj
2.76%
PG&E Corp.
2.70%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.69%
Emerson Electric Co.
2.61%
Frequently asked questions about URA and NUKZ
How have the URA and NUKZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, URA is down -6.62% year-to-date (YTD), while NUKZ has returned 3.02%. That puts NUKZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or NUKZ?
Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$835M in flows, compared to +$46M for NUKZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: URA or NUKZ?
Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 44.75%, while NUKZ experienced 27.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: URA or NUKZ?
As of July 24, 2026, URA holds $5.55 B in assets under management (AUM), while NUKZ manages $787.48 M.
What sectors do the URA and NUKZ ETFs invest in?
URA leans toward sectors like Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, NUKZ focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the URA ETF and NUKZ ETF?
URA top holdings include Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd.. NUKZ holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., GE Vernova, Inc. and Samsung C&T Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: URA or NUKZ?
URA holds 49 securities with 79.24% of its assets in the top 15. NUKZ has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.67%.
Advertisement
Latest news about URA & NUKZ
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
Range ETFs Debuts New Lineup of 4 Thematic Energy ETFs on NYSE ARCA
February 6, 2024
NUKZ
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
URA
Advertisement
