URAvsLITETF Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.75% for LIT. URA is up 10.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$894M in YTD flows. LIT performs better with 13.5% YTD performance, and -$117M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
URA vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA LIT | +6.59%-1.83% | +2.75%-5.30% | +10.59%+13.50% | +20.19%+44.14% | +121.69%+31.39% | +135.99%-9.17% |
| Flows | URA LIT | -$3M-$29M | +$52M-$319M | +$894M-$117M | +$1.87B-$118M | +$2.74B-$1.23B | +$3.92B-$1.61B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA LIT | +41.32%+28.54% | +45.67%+27.41% | +37.10%+26.49% | +37.39%+26.01% |
| Max drawdown | URA LIT | -21.92%-19.92% | -38.47%-25.52% | -38.47%-42.55% | -38.47%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | URA LIT | 72d84d | 223d120d | 223d745d | 223d1751d |
URA | LIT | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 2:31 PM | $47.22 | $74.42 |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $47.50 | $73.79 |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
URA | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
URA | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.22 | $74.42 |
| 1D performance | -0.59% | +0.85% |
| AuM | $6.63 B | $1.55 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.75% |
