Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
URAvsLITETF Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, LIT's top sector exposures are Materials, Industrials and Information Technology. URA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.75% for LIT. URA is up 21.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$834M in YTD flows. LIT performs worse with 10.54% YTD performance, and +$53M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
URA vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA LIT | -2.84%-0.18% | +15.02%+11.61% | +21.62%+10.54% | +135.60%+79.35% | +200.79%+20.60% | +261.86%+28.28% |
| Flows | URA LIT | +$177M-$33M | +$1.13B+$68M | +$834M+$53M | +$1.47B+$9M | +$2.82B-$1.39B | +$4.07B-$614M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA LIT | +48.61%+27.45% | +42.50%+27.39% | +34.08%+25.21% | +36.58%+26.03% |
| Max drawdown | URA LIT | -19.14%-9.00% | -28.67%-20.77% | -36.76%-51.18% | -37.14%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | URA LIT | 41d13d | 97d120d | 214d895d | 738d1569d |
URA | LIT | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.36 | $72.99 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $52.31 | $72.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
URA | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
URA | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.36 | $72.99 |
| 1D performance | -1.82% | +1.35% |
| AuM | $7.25 B | $1.69 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.75% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the URA and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, URA is up 21.62% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has returned 10.54%. That puts URA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or LIT?
Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$834M in flows, compared to +$53M for LIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: URA or LIT?
Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 42.5%, while LIT experienced 27.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: URA or LIT?
As of March 10, 2026, URA holds $7.25 B in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $1.69 B.
What sectors do the URA and LIT ETFs invest in?
URA leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, LIT focuses on Materials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the URA ETF and LIT ETF?
URA top holdings include CAMECO, ALTC ACQUISITION and URANIUM ENERGY. LIT holds in its top three: US7672041008, ALBEMARLE and SAMSUNG SDI.
Which ETF is more diversified: URA or LIT?
URA holds 48 securities with 79.92% of its assets in the top 15. LIT has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.27%.
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.