URAvsLITETF Comparison
VS
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.75% for LIT. URA is down -20.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$907M in YTD flows. LIT performs better with -5.94% YTD performance, and -$241M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
URA vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA LIT | -19.09%-12.78% | -17.39%-12.56% | -20.37%-5.94% | -27.81%+5.74% | +52.52%+28.93% | +43.88%-29.51% |
| Flows | URA LIT | +$12M-$118M | +$93M-$180M | +$907M-$241M | +$1.65B-$203M | +$2.72B-$1.20B | +$3.54B-$1.83B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA LIT | +38.41%+21.72% | +44.19%+26.71% | +37.40%+26.34% | +36.72%+25.93% |
| Max drawdown | URA LIT | -29.44%-20.94% | -44.05%-32.24% | -44.05%-35.88% | -44.05%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | URA LIT | 57d60d | 268d165d | 268d617d | 268d1796d |
Trading data
URA | LIT | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.11 | $60.68 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $34.09 | $60.68 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
URA | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URA | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.11 | $60.68 |
| 1D performance | +0.06% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $4.79 B | $1.17 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.75% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
URA
Data will be available soon
LIT
Data will be available soon
Sectors
URA
Data will be available soon
LIT
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
URA
Data will be available soon
LIT
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
URA
Data will be available soon
LIT
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about URA and LIT
How have the URA and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, URA is down -20.37% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has lost -5.94%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or LIT?
Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$907M in flows, compared to -$241M for LIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: URA or LIT?
Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 44.19%, while LIT experienced 26.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: URA or LIT?
As of October 23, 2026, URA holds $4.79 B in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $1.17 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about URA & LIT
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
Advertisement
