URAvsLITETF Comparison
VS
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, LIT's top sector exposures are Materials, Industrials and Information Technology. URA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.75% for LIT. URA is up 6.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$825M in YTD flows. LIT performs better with 26.23% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
URA vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA LIT | -16.76%-7.90% | -11.12%+13.73% | +6.06%+26.23% | +32.03%+119.39% | +132.79%+31.57% | +150.52%+21.82% |
| Flows | URA LIT | -$134M-$19M | -$854K-$5M | +$825M+$41M | +$1.90B+$86M | +$2.82B-$1.28B | +$3.83B-$861M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA LIT | +45.81%+28.49% | +44.18%+27.68% | +35.83%+25.99% | +37.25%+26.29% |
| Max drawdown | URA LIT | -25.78%-14.18% | -30.03%-14.18% | -36.76%-51.18% | -37.14%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | URA LIT | 37d32d | 135d32d | 214d895d | 738d1663d |
Trading data
URA | LIT | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.52 | $82.37 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $44.83 | $80.74 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
URA | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URA | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.52 | $82.37 |
| 1D performance | +1.54% | +2.02% |
| AuM | $6.29 B | $1.91 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.75% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
URA
Canada
43.97%
USA
22.13%
Republic of Korea
16.43%
Australia
9.21%
Other
8.25%
LIT
USA
34.43%
China
33.42%
Republic of Korea
13.2%
Australia
8.99%
Japan
7.28%
Other
2.68%
Sectors
URA
Energy
51.28%
Industrials
25.36%
Other
23.36%
LIT
Materials
32.35%
Industrials
18.52%
Information Techn.
14.84%
Consumer Discreti.
9.35%
Other
24.94%
Advertisement
Diversification
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.87%
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.74%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
URA
CAMECO
22.37%
ALTC ACQUISITION
6.80%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.11%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.42%
US63253R2013
4.77%
DAEWOO ENG&CONST
4.46%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
4.37%
ENERGY FUELS
4.00%
PALADIN ENERGY
3.34%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
3.30%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP
2.83%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY
2.82%
DENISON MINES
2.82%
BHP GROUP LTD
2.33%
KEPCO E&C
2.12%
LIT
US7672041008
19.03%
SAMSUNG SDI
7.20%
ALBEMARLE
6.77%
PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION
4.29%
PILBARA MINERALS
4.02%
GANFENG LITHIUM
3.99%
US8336351056
3.93%
NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
3.58%
AMPEREX TECH
3.49%
TIANQI LITHIUM
3.24%
TDK
3.00%
TINCI MATERIALS
2.90%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
2.82%
BYD
2.79%
EVE ENERGY
2.71%
Frequently asked questions about URA and LIT
How have the URA and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, URA is up 6.06% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has returned 26.23%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or LIT?
Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$825M in flows, compared to +$41M for LIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: URA or LIT?
Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 44.18%, while LIT experienced 27.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: URA or LIT?
As of June 12, 2026, URA holds $6.29 B in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $1.91 B.
What sectors do the URA and LIT ETFs invest in?
URA leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, LIT focuses on Materials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the URA ETF and LIT ETF?
URA top holdings include CAMECO, ALTC ACQUISITION and NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. LIT holds in its top three: US7672041008, SAMSUNG SDI and ALBEMARLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: URA or LIT?
URA holds 49 securities with 77.87% of its assets in the top 15. LIT has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.74%.
Advertisement
Latest news about URA & LIT
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
URA
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
Advertisement
