Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
URAvsICLNETF Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. URA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.39% for ICLN. URA is up 21.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$834M in YTD flows. ICLN performs worse with 11.44% YTD performance, and +$22M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
URA vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA ICLN | -2.84%-3.24% | +15.02%+10.26% | +21.62%+11.44% | +135.60%+62.65% | +200.79%+0.17% | +261.86%-18.36% |
| Flows | URA ICLN | +$177M+$45M | +$1.13B+$35M | +$834M+$22M | +$1.47B+$75M | +$2.82B-$1.82B | +$4.07B-$1.09B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA ICLN | +48.61%+25.48% | +42.50%+23.11% | +34.08%+22.28% | +36.58%+25.82% |
| Max drawdown | URA ICLN | -19.14%-8.79% | -28.67%-10.55% | -36.76%-44.77% | -37.14%-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | URA ICLN | 41d13d | 97d77d | 214d1016d | 738d1590d |
URA | ICLN | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.36 | $18.51 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $52.31 | $18.25 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
URA | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
URA | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.36 | $18.51 |
| 1D performance | -1.82% | +1.42% |
| AuM | $7.25 B | $2.14 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.39% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the URA and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, URA is up 21.62% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 11.44%. That puts URA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$834M in flows, compared to +$22M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: URA or ICLN?
Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 42.5%, while ICLN experienced 23.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: URA or ICLN?
As of March 10, 2026, URA holds $7.25 B in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.14 B.
What sectors do the URA and ICLN ETFs invest in?
URA leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the URA ETF and ICLN ETF?
URA top holdings include CAMECO, ALTC ACQUISITION and URANIUM ENERGY. ICLN holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, US65290E1010 and FIRST SOLAR.
Which ETF is more diversified: URA or ICLN?
URA holds 48 securities with 79.92% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.94%.
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.