BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

URAvsICLNETF Comparison

ETF 1

URA

Global X Uranium ETF

This fund is part of

Alternative Energy

+2.21%

Full URA fund page

VS

ETF 2

ICLN

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

This fund is part of

Alternative Energy

+2.21%

Full ICLN fund page

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. URA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.38% for ICLN. URA is up 10.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$894M in YTD flows. ICLN performs better with 11.64% YTD performance, and +$72M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

URA vs ICLN performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 09/08/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	URA ICLN	+6.59%+1.32%	+2.75%-12.83%	+10.59%+11.64%	+20.19%+26.60%	+121.69%+23.70%	+135.99%-14.99%
Flows	URA ICLN	-$3M+$12M	+$52M-$573M	+$894M+$72M	+$1.87B+$198M	+$2.74B-$1.21B	+$3.92B-$2.07B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	URA ICLN	+41.32%+32.74%	+45.67%+28.89%	+37.10%+24.59%	+37.39%+26.58%
Max drawdown	URA ICLN	-21.92%-21.80%	-38.47%-28.47%	-38.47%-31.13%	-38.47%-56.66%
Max drawdown duration	URA ICLN	72d78d	223d98d	223d631d	223d1772d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	URA	ICLN
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 2:31 PM	$47.20	$18.17
Previous close 09/08/2026	$47.50	$18.31
Consolidated volume 09/08/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of August 31, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	URA	ICLN
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 9/9/2026 at 2:31 PM

Live

Closed

	URA	ICLN
Last price	$47.20	$18.17
1D performance	-0.63%	-0.79%
AuM	$6.63 B	$2.10 B
E/R	0.69%	0.38%

Characteristics

	URA	ICLN
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Global X	iShares
Benchmark	Solactive Global Uranium Index	S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index
N° of holdings	-	104
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	November 4, 2010	June 24, 2008
ESG	No	Yes

More URA data on Trackinsight

More ICLN data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

URA

Data will be available soon

ICLN

USA

36.76%

China

22.42%

Other

40.81%

Sectors

URA

Data will be available soon

ICLN

Industrials

48.56%

Utilities

41.75%

Technology

7.31%

Other

2.39%

Diversification

URA

Data will be available soon

ICLN

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

59.72%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 1, 1970

URA

Data will be available soon

ICLN

China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.

7.92%

First Solar, Inc.

7.85%

Nextpower, Inc.

7.54%

Bloom Energy Corp.

6.96%

Enphase Energy, Inc.

4.56%

Vestas Wind Systems A/S

3.65%

Equatorial SA

3.30%

Plug Power, Inc.

2.70%

EDP SA

2.68%

Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.

2.46%

SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.

2.35%

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.

2.22%

Suzlon Energy Ltd.

2.00%

Clearway Energy, Inc.

1.91%

Ørsted A/S

1.62%

Frequently asked questions about URA and ICLN

How have the URA and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 8, 2026, URA is up 10.59% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 11.64%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or ICLN?

Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$894M in flows, compared to +$72M for ICLN.

Which ETF is more volatile: URA or ICLN?

Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 45.67%, while ICLN experienced 28.89%.

Which ETF is bigger: URA or ICLN?

As of September 8, 2026, URA holds $6.63 B in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.10 B.

ICLN

There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium

January 11, 2024

URA

URAvsICLNETF Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

URA vs ICLN performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the URA and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 8, 2026, URA is up 10.59% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 11.64%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or ICLN?

Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$894M in flows, compared to +$72M for ICLN.

Which ETF is more volatile: URA or ICLN?

Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 45.67%, while ICLN experienced 28.89%.

Which ETF is bigger: URA or ICLN?

As of September 8, 2026, URA holds $6.63 B in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.10 B.

Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs

Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch

The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?

Green Energy ETFs Surge as Traditional Oil Stocks Face Decline

Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE

Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE

Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs

There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium

Expert-Built ETF Portfolios, All in One Place