URAvsICLNETF Comparison
VS
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. URA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.39% for ICLN. URA is down -3.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$835M in YTD flows. ICLN performs better with 12.43% YTD performance, and +$377M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
URA vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA ICLN | -9.58%-10.97% | -27.58%-8.42% | -3.60%+12.43% | +5.91%+33.64% | +116.54%+2.75% | +158.57%-12.78% |
| Flows | URA ICLN | +$10M-$260M | -$23M+$276M | +$835M+$377M | +$1.85B+$515M | +$2.82B-$1.04B | +$3.90B-$1.70B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA ICLN | +44.32%+36.49% | +44.73%+28.11% | +36.33%+24.31% | +37.46%+26.34% |
| Max drawdown | URA ICLN | -33.01%-23.17% | -36.85%-23.17% | -36.85%-41.79% | -37.14%-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | URA ICLN | 78d51d | 176d51d | 176d911d | 738d1725d |
Trading data
URA | ICLN | |
Last sale 7/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.13 | $18.37 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $40.97 | $18.54 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
URA | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URA | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.13 | $18.37 |
| 1D performance | +0.39% | -0.92% |
| AuM | $5.73 B | $2.42 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.39% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
URA
Canada
42.07%
USA
21.88%
Republic of Korea
13.99%
Australia
9.1%
Other
12.96%
ICLN
USA
45.59%
China
18.15%
Other
36.26%
Sectors
URA
Energy
54.35%
Industrials
24.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
13.93%
ICLN
Industrials
56.7%
Utilities
33.46%
Technology
7.95%
Other
1.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
URA
Cameco Corp.
24.63%
Oklo, Inc.
6.72%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.14%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.32%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.81%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.73%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.75%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.06%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.98%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.95%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.87%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
2.79%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.65%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.24%
ICLN
Bloom Energy Corp.
14.75%
First Solar, Inc.
8.41%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.32%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
5.78%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.87%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.11%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.85%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.65%
Equatorial SA
2.56%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.52%
EDP SA
2.25%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.22%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.60%
Ørsted A/S
1.55%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
1.46%
Frequently asked questions about URA and ICLN
How have the URA and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 23, 2026, URA is down -3.6% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 12.43%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$835M in flows, compared to +$377M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: URA or ICLN?
Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 44.73%, while ICLN experienced 28.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: URA or ICLN?
As of July 23, 2026, URA holds $5.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.42 B.
What sectors do the URA and ICLN ETFs invest in?
URA leans toward sectors like Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the URA ETF and ICLN ETF?
URA top holdings include Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd.. ICLN holds in its top three: Bloom Energy Corp., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: URA or ICLN?
URA holds 49 securities with 79.24% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 104 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.9%.
Advertisement
Latest news about URA & ICLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
