URAvsICLNETF Comparison
VS
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. URA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.39% for ICLN. URA is up 29.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$935M in YTD flows. ICLN performs worse with 21.87% YTD performance, and +$101M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
URA vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA ICLN | +15.47%+9.19% | -0.06%+9.65% | +29.40%+21.87% | +137.21%+73.58% | +230.79%+6.14% | +252.55%-12.72% |
| Flows | URA ICLN | +$103M+$78M | +$571M+$101M | +$935M+$101M | +$1.78B+$188M | +$2.97B-$1.68B | +$4.07B-$1.44B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA ICLN | +48.01%+29.40% | +42.72%+23.51% | +34.71%+22.69% | +36.70%+25.57% |
| Max drawdown | URA ICLN | -24.86%-8.79% | -28.67%-10.55% | -36.76%-44.44% | -37.14%-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | URA ICLN | 86d47d | 97d77d | 214d1009d | 738d1635d |
Trading data
URA | ICLN | |
Last sale 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.31 | $19.99 |
| Previous close 04/23/2026 | $56.47 | $20.14 |
| Consolidated volume 04/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
URA | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URA | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.31 | $19.99 |
| 1D performance | -2.05% | -0.74% |
| AuM | $7.80 B | $2.42 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.39% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
URA
Canada
46.05%
USA
22.05%
Republic of Korea
13.15%
Australia
9.32%
Other
9.43%
ICLN
USA
42.34%
China
17.6%
Brazil
8.48%
Spain
8.19%
Other
23.39%
Sectors
URA
Energy
53.91%
Industrials
22.79%
Other
23.3%
ICLN
Utilities
43.42%
Industrials
25.6%
Information Techn.
14.4%
Other
16.58%
Advertisement
Diversification
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.56%
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
URA
CAMECO
23.52%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.56%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.91%
ALTC ACQUISITION
5.57%
US63253R2013
5.27%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
4.83%
ENERGY FUELS
3.93%
PALADIN ENERGY
3.46%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
3.31%
DENISON MINES
3.01%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP
2.90%
BHP GROUP LTD
2.40%
DAEWOO ENG&CONST
2.39%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY
2.34%
ITOCHU
2.17%
ICLN
US65290E1010
10.17%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
9.40%
FIRST SOLAR
6.13%
IBERDROLA SA
5.76%
YANGTZE POWER
4.70%
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES
3.19%
ENPHASE ENERGY
3.04%
EQUATORIAL ENERGIA
2.90%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
2.69%
ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL
2.24%
CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER
2.11%
ORSTED
2.08%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC
2.05%
PLUG POWER
1.93%
SOLAREDGE TECH/D
1.87%
Frequently asked questions about URA and ICLN
How have the URA and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, URA is up 29.4% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 21.87%. That puts URA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$935M in flows, compared to +$101M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: URA or ICLN?
Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 42.72%, while ICLN experienced 23.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: URA or ICLN?
As of April 24, 2026, URA holds $7.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.42 B.
What sectors do the URA and ICLN ETFs invest in?
URA leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the URA ETF and ICLN ETF?
URA top holdings include CAMECO, NEXGEN ENERGY LTD and URANIUM ENERGY. ICLN holds in its top three: US65290E1010, BLOOM ENERGY CORP and FIRST SOLAR.
Which ETF is more diversified: URA or ICLN?
URA holds 49 securities with 77.56% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about URA & ICLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
