UGAvsBNOETF Comparison
United States Gasoline ETF (UGA) and United States Brent Oil ETF (BNO) belong to the same industry segment: Energy. UGA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.02%, versus 1.14% for BNO. UGA is up 134.19% year-to-date (YTD) with -$24M in YTD flows. BNO performs better with 150.36% YTD performance, and +$471M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UGA and BNO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
UGA vs BNO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UGA BNO | -3.42%+17.86% | +15.38%+31.62% | +134.19%+150.36% | +123.55%+137.52% | +120.55%+125.78% | +229.76%+212.92% |
| Flows | UGA BNO | -$29M+$62M | -$15M+$18M | -$24M+$471M | +$9M+$479M | -$10M+$425M | -$63M+$248M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UGA BNO | +35.32%+42.88% | +39.95%+49.85% | +32.28%+37.11% | +35.73%+38.02% |
| Max drawdown | UGA BNO | -14.53%-15.74% | -20.88%-34.30% | -25.39%-34.30% | -37.61%-34.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | UGA BNO | 28d28d | 65d127d | 682d127d | 1363d127d |
UGA | BNO | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $144.92 | $70.99 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $142.39 | $68.91 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
UGA | BNO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
UGA | BNO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $144.92 | $70.99 |
| 1D performance | +1.78% | +3.02% |
| AuM | $159.13 M | $906.59 M |
| E/R | 1.02% | 1.14% |
