UCOvsBOILETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF (UCO) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas ETF (BOIL) belong to the same industry segment: Leveraged Commodity. UCO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.47%, versus 1.39% for BOIL. UCO is up 240.91% year-to-date (YTD) with -$508M in YTD flows. BOIL performs worse with -61.23% YTD performance, and -$195M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UCO and BOIL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UCO vs BOIL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UCO BOIL | +26.19%-19.09% | +47.32%-23.98% | +240.91%-61.23% | +204.81%-70.44% | +93.73%-96.98% | +163.31%-99.89% |
| Flows | UCO BOIL | -$52M-$8M | -$147M-$5M | -$508M-$195M | -$569M-$255M | -$646M+$652M | -$1.86B+$2.60B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UCO BOIL | +52.90%+68.50% | +64.36%+111.92% | +55.66%+106.75% | +62.67%+122.67% |
| Max drawdown | UCO BOIL | -20.49%-28.89% | -38.76%-79.95% | -48.72%-97.42% | -66.84%-99.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | UCO BOIL | 27d29d | 114d320d | 698d1088d | 1582d1600d |
Trading data
UCO | BOIL | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.40 | $17.85 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $66.11 | $17.50 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 26, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
UCO | BOIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UCO | BOIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.40 | $17.85 |
| 1D performance | -1.07% | +2.00% |
| AuM | $483.19 M | $349.00 M |
| E/R | 1.47% | 1.39% |
Characteristics
UCO | BOIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index | Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Commodities | Commodities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 24, 2008 | April 10, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UCO
Data will be available soon
BOIL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
UCO
Data will be available soon
BOIL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
UCO
Data will be available soon
BOIL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
UCO
Data will be available soon
BOIL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about UCO and BOIL
How have the UCO and BOIL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, UCO is up 240.91% year-to-date (YTD), while BOIL has lost -61.23%. That puts UCO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UCO or BOIL?
Year-to-date, the UCO ETF saw -$508M in flows, compared to -$195M for BOIL.
Which ETF is more volatile: UCO or BOIL?
Over the past year, UCO had a volatility of 64.36%, while BOIL experienced 111.92%.
Which ETF is bigger: UCO or BOIL?
As of October 23, 2026, UCO holds $483.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while BOIL manages $349.00 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about UCO & BOIL
Advertisement
