UCOvsAGQETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF (UCO) and ProShares Ultra SILVER ETF (AGQ) belong to the same industry segment: Leveraged Commodity. UCO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.47%, versus 1.29% for AGQ. UCO is up 240.91% year-to-date (YTD) with -$508M in YTD flows. AGQ performs worse with -66.38% YTD performance, and +$381M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UCO and AGQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UCO vs AGQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UCO AGQ | +26.19%-31.78% | +47.32%-17.86% | +240.91%-66.38% | +204.81%-35.15% | +93.73%+99.06% | +163.31%+33.40% |
| Flows | UCO AGQ | -$52M+$65M | -$147M+$65M | -$508M+$381M | -$569M+$462M | -$646M+$304M | -$1.86B+$263M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UCO AGQ | +52.90%+70.63% | +64.36%+131.06% | +55.66%+90.55% | +62.67%+79.47% |
| Max drawdown | UCO AGQ | -20.49%-42.29% | -38.76%-86.84% | -48.72%-86.84% | -66.84%-86.84% |
| Max drawdown duration | UCO AGQ | 27d61d | 114d270d | 698d270d | 1582d270d |
Trading data
UCO | AGQ | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.40 | $52.46 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $66.11 | $52.60 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 26, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
UCO | AGQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UCO | AGQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.40 | $52.46 |
| 1D performance | -1.07% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $483.19 M | $995.89 M |
| E/R | 1.47% | 1.29% |
Characteristics
UCO | AGQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index | Bloomberg Silver Subindex |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Commodities | Commodities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 24, 2008 | December 1, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Exposure data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about UCO and AGQ
How have the UCO and AGQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, UCO is up 240.91% year-to-date (YTD), while AGQ has lost -66.38%. That puts UCO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UCO or AGQ?
Year-to-date, the UCO ETF saw -$508M in flows, compared to +$381M for AGQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: UCO or AGQ?
Over the past year, UCO had a volatility of 64.36%, while AGQ experienced 131.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: UCO or AGQ?
As of October 23, 2026, UCO holds $483.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while AGQ manages $995.89 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about UCO & AGQ
Advertisement
